Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 23:22 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 05:46:15PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +cpnfirmed
> >
> > On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 09:51 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:29:3
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 05:46:15PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +cpnfirmed
>
> On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 09:51 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:29:30PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 14:37:57 +0200, Wouter Verhelst w
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +cpnfirmed
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 09:51 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:29:30PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 14:37:57 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
[...]
> > > If you don't want me to immediately upload, what do you w
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:29:30PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 14:37:57 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 15:33 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 14:37:57 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 15:33 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:07:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > That's much bigger than I w
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 15:33 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:07:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > That's much bigger than I was expecting given your description, and I'm
> > > not sure all of the c
On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 15:33 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:07:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > That's much bigger than I was expecting given your description, and I'm
> > not sure all of the changes were intended to be included.
>
> Crap. I fucked up again. Can yo
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:07:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> That's much bigger than I was expecting given your description, and I'm
> not sure all of the changes were intended to be included.
Crap. I fucked up again. Can you reject that, or is it too late?
--
It is easy to love a country
On Tue, 2015-07-14 at 22:40 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:21:02PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 19:07 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > #785727 describes a regression in the version of nbd-server in jessie
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:21:02PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 19:07 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > #785727 describes a regression in the version of nbd-server in jessie
> > wrt the one in wheezy, related to the "allow" configuration fil
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 19:07 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> #785727 describes a regression in the version of nbd-server in jessie
> wrt the one in wheezy, related to the "allow" configuration file. It's
> not a security-related bug (as it disallows more than it should),
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
#785727 describes a regression in the version of nbd-server in jessie
wrt the one in wheezy, related to the "allow" configuration file. It's
not a security-related bug (as it di
12 matches
Mail list logo
