On 15/01/18 09:14, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:03:27PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
>> I see that you pushed a commit to Build-Depend on libvte-2.91-dev. But
>> vte2.91 is gtk3 only so this bug is also a request to port rasmol to
>> gtk3.
>
> Would you be able t
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 3:14 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Would you be able to give any better replacement for the deprecated
> libvte9 which does not require a gtk3 port? Sorry for my very naive
> attempt but I simply have no idea about GTK porting issues.
I am unaware of any such library. The la
Hi Jeremy,
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 11:03:27PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> I see that you pushed a commit to Build-Depend on libvte-2.91-dev. But
> vte2.91 is gtk3 only so this bug is also a request to port rasmol to
> gtk3.
Would you be able to give any better replacement for the deprecated
libv
Andreas,
I see that you pushed a commit to Build-Depend on libvte-2.91-dev. But
vte2.91 is gtk3 only so this bug is also a request to port rasmol to
gtk3.
Thanks,
Jeremy Bicha
Control: tags -1 help
Hi Graham,
On Sat, 4 Jul 2015 12:11:06 +0200 you wrote:
> I'll have a look when I get a chance, possibly at debcamp next month.
I've commited some general packaging changes (short dh would be a nice
thing to have as well but I did not want to fiddle around with this in
a st
Control: severity -1 serious
Control: tags -1 -stretch
We do not intent to release Debian 10 "Buster" with the unmaintained
src: vte. Therefore, I am raising the severity of this bug.
On behalf of the Debian GNOME team,
Jeremy Bicha
6 matches
Mail list logo
