On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
>> Thanks for considering it! :)
>> We uploaded also a patched epydoc to our repository today and are
>> currently rebuilding affected packages [1]. The page should be
>> updated soon
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> Thanks for considering it! :)
> We uploaded also a patched epydoc to our repository today and are
> currently rebuilding affected packages [1]. The page should be
> updated soon.
Ok, what you're asking for makes sense to me. I agree that i
Hi Ken and Edward,
On Thu, Jul 02, 2015 at 02:56:19PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> I have been following the reproducible builds effort. I appreciate
> you providing this patch. However, I have some concerns with it.
>
> My main concern is that this patch adds some rather Debian-specific
>
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> In 3.0.1+dfsg-6 a patch has been added that allows packages to disable
> embedding of timestamps.
> But the default behavior of epydoc is to still embed timestamps (which
> requires modifications
> for each package using epydoc).
> If time
Source: epydoc
Version: 3.0.1+dfsg-7
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: toolchain timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
In 3.0.1+dfsg-6 a patch has been added that allows packages to disable
embedding of t
5 matches
Mail list logo
