On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 17:56:44 +0100 Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 09/07/15 17:09, Michael Stone wrote:
> > I'll add it with the next debian upload and it presumably should go in
> > coreutils upstream also.
>
> Done.
I keep reproducing it in Testing (coreutils 8.24.1), and I can't find
it in
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:50:51PM +0100, you wrote:
I keep reproducing it in Testing (coreutils 8.24.1), and I can't find
it in src/dircolors.hin.
Was the fix applied?
Look for 8.25, which adds wildcarding, so things like *256color work and
makes this a bit less fragile.
Mike Stone
Package: coreutils
Version: 8.23-4
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
The commands depending on 'dircolor' ('ls', 'dir', etc) do not output colors
when you are using TERM=tmux or TERM=tmux-256color inside of tmux.
This happens because LS_COLORS is empty when using those terminfos, as
On 09/07/15 16:03, Víctor Cuadrado Juan wrote:
Package: coreutils
Version: 8.23-4
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
The commands depending on 'dircolor' ('ls', 'dir', etc) do not output colors
when you are using TERM=tmux or TERM=tmux-256color inside of tmux.
This happens because
On 09/07/15 17:09, Michael Stone wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 04:38:07PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
May be Debian specific?
The following is on Fedora 22:
$ TERM=screen-256color tput colors
256
$ TERM=tmux-256color tput colors
tput: unknown terminal tmux-256color
Fedora will
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 04:38:07PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
May be Debian specific?
The following is on Fedora 22:
$ TERM=screen-256color tput colors
256
$ TERM=tmux-256color tput colors
tput: unknown terminal tmux-256color
Fedora will presumably upgrade to newer upstream terminfo that
6 matches
Mail list logo
