Hi,
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 11:22:10AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 09:44:30 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Hi mips porters,
> >
> > could anybody please find a more powerful machine to build the rdepends
> > libfreecontact-perl and python-freecontact.
> >
> No, as
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 09:44:30 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi mips porters,
>
> could anybody please find a more powerful machine to build the rdepends
> libfreecontact-perl and python-freecontact.
>
No, as I already said that is not acceptable. Packages should be built
on buildds. Reliabl
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi mips porters,
>
> could anybody please find a more powerful machine to build the rdepends
> libfreecontact-perl and python-freecontact.
>
> Alternatively I would decide to exclude mips architecture for
> libfreecontact and its Perl and Pyth
Hi mips porters,
could anybody please find a more powerful machine to build the rdepends
libfreecontact-perl and python-freecontact.
Alternatively I would decide to exclude mips architecture for
libfreecontact and its Perl and Python interfaces since I see no point
in delivering a package that do
Control: reopen -1
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 17:42:10 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:20:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 17:05:39 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > > Any chance to do a manual build on a more powerfull MIPS bo
On Fri, 2015-08-28 18:08:33 +, Dejan Latinovic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this is obviously a consequence of mips buildd's limitations.
> In past all three successfully builds had happened on ball.
> I also was able to built freecontact successfully for mips on machine
> with FPU, locally.
> On machine w
Hi,
this is obviously a consequence of mips buildd's limitations.
In past all three successfully builds had happened on ball.
I also was able to built freecontact successfully for mips on machine with FPU,
localy.
On machine without FPU, if icme_timeout is significantly increased
tests executes
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 17:42:10 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Julien,
>
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:20:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 17:05:39 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >
> > > Any chance to do a manual build on a more powerfull MIPS box which might
> > >
Hi Julien,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 05:20:55PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 17:05:39 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Any chance to do a manual build on a more powerfull MIPS box which might
> > not run into this problem?
> >
> NAK. We need packages to build reliably
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 17:05:39 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Any chance to do a manual build on a more powerfull MIPS box which might
> not run into this problem?
>
NAK. We need packages to build reliably on our buildds.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hello Andreas!
On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 17:05:39 +0200 Andreas Tille wrote:
> Any chance to do a manual build on a more powerfull MIPS box which might
> not run into this problem?
I think we should disable the test suite (override_dh_auto_test).
What do you think?
Best regards,
Laszlo
signature
Hi Dejan,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 02:44:50PM +, Dejan Latinovic wrote:
> I had tried to build freecontact locally on two different cavium boards.
Thanks for this. (I'm running the build on gabrielli currently ... and yes,
it takes time).
> On both board build failed with TERM signal error o
Hi,
I had tried to build freecontact locally on two different cavium boards.
On both board build failed with TERM signal error on testing.
It seems that this is the command that causes TERM signal:
> /build/freecontact-hkgMtc/freecontact-1.0.21/src/.libs/lt-freecontact
> --parprof=psicov --d
https://dsa.debian.org/doc/schroot
On August 26, 2015 1:36:45 PM CEST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:09:27PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:32:25 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>>
>> > I wonder whether this might be connected to some transition issue.
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 11:09:27PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:32:25 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > I wonder whether this might be connected to some transition issue. At
> > least I have no idea how to track this down. Its no upstream version
> > and before I did
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:32:25 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Mips porters,
>
> I wonder whether this might be connected to some transition issue. At
> least I have no idea how to track this down. Its no upstream version
> and before I did the gcc transition of libfreecontact everything wen
Hi Mips porters,
I wonder whether this might be connected to some transition issue. At
least I have no idea how to track this down. Its no upstream version
and before I did the gcc transition of libfreecontact everything went
fine.
Any help would be welcome
Andreas.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015
Source: freecontact
Version: 1.0.21-4
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)
Hi,
your package failed to build on the mips buildd, see the log at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=freecontact&arch=mips&ver=1.0.21-4&stamp=144013
18 matches
Mail list logo
