Bug#796855: gcc-5: guile-2.0 fails to build with offset problem on armel

2015-09-04 Thread Matthias Klose
On 09/04/2015 03:38 AM, Rob Browning wrote: > Rob Browning writes: > >> You mean -O0, perhaps? > > Actually, there may be a mistake in the current rules file which is > causing it to always build without an -O flag... > > Changing the rules to work correctly (to use -O2

Bug#796855: gcc-5: guile-2.0 fails to build with offset problem on armel

2015-09-04 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2015-09-04 3:38 GMT+02:00 Rob Browning : > Rob Browning writes: > >> You mean -O0, perhaps? > > Actually, there may be a mistake in the current rules file which is > causing it to always build without an -O flag... > > Changing the rules to

Bug#796855: gcc-5: guile-2.0 fails to build with offset problem on armel

2015-09-03 Thread Rob Browning
Hector Oron writes: > As a workaround, if you build package with -O2 (no optimization the > package seems to build fine on abel.d.o): You mean -O0, perhaps? And regardless, if there's an optimization level that will work, then that's great (should have though to try that

Bug#796855: gcc-5: guile-2.0 fails to build with offset problem on armel

2015-09-03 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2015-08-31 23:08 GMT+02:00 Moritz Muehlenhoff : > I'm adding debian-arm to CC, can any of the armel porters please look into > this? I have done a quick test on abel.debian.org. Here the results: We seem to hint a bug in the optimizer leading to bogus assembler...

Bug#796855: gcc-5: guile-2.0 fails to build with offset problem on armel

2015-09-03 Thread Rob Browning
Rob Browning writes: > You mean -O0, perhaps? Actually, there may be a mistake in the current rules file which is causing it to always build without an -O flag... Changing the rules to work correctly (to use -O2 as you mentioned) appears to fix the problem, though I

Bug#796855: gcc-5: guile-2.0 fails to build with offset problem on armel

2015-08-31 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 06:54:49PM -0500, Rob Browning wrote: > > Feel free to downgrade this if you think appropriate, but given that 4.8 > is scheduled to be removed from stretch at some point, this will > eventually become grave for guile-2.0. (The problem appears to affect > gcc-4.9 as

Bug#796855: gcc-5: guile-2.0 fails to build with offset problem on armel

2015-08-24 Thread Rob Browning
Feel free to downgrade this if you think appropriate, but given that 4.8 is scheduled to be removed from stretch at some point, this will eventually become grave for guile-2.0. (The problem appears to affect gcc-4.9 as well.) For reference, it looks like a similar problem on armhf may have been