On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 09:29:00PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> libical is already in testing.
Oh!
[...]
> From your side it's all done now, so you can stop worrying about this. :)
Great, thanks! :)
Regards,
Andreas Henriksson
On 16/05/16 11:10, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello release team!
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:44:36PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 06/05/16 09:44, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 =
>>>
>>> The libical testsuite/FTBFS bugs should now
Hello release team!
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 01:44:36PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>
> On 06/05/16 09:44, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 =
> >
> > The libical testsuite/FTBFS bugs should now be fixed in experimental
[...]
> Go ahead.
A quick
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 06/05/16 09:44, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Control: tags -1 =
>
> The libical testsuite/FTBFS bugs should now be fixed in experimental
> and everything should be ready to go thus unsetting the morinfo
> tag. Please tell me once we ready to kick off this transition.
Control: tags -1 =
The libical testsuite/FTBFS bugs should now be fixed in experimental
and everything should be ready to go thus unsetting the morinfo
tag. Please tell me once we ready to kick off this transition.
(Sourceful uploads for the blocker bugs to experimental has not happened
as fas as
Control: block -1 by 822565 822569 822572
Hello!
The FTBFS bugs for the libical2 transition has now been filed
including trivial patches for all of them.
(Waiting for libical to get through binary-NEW and then likely
follow up with an arm build fix before removing the moreinfo tag.)
Regards,
An
Control: retitle -1 transition: libical2
Hello release-team!
A new upstream release of libical is out -> 2.0.0. This version comes
with a new so name. I'm repurposing this old bug report, initially
filed for the unfortunate and unexpected ABI breakage in 1.0.1,
for the new version. A transition t
7 matches
Mail list logo