On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 01:03:43AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> (In the absence of this bug being fixed, what is the correct approach
> when all reverse-deps found are in fact satisfied by a virtual
> package?)
I've been advised that the check is only advisory so and once reviewed,
the
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
>From IRC discussions this is apparently a known and old bug, but I
couldn't find a report about it. As in this example:
$ dak rm -Rn libfile-spec-perl
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
libany-template-processdir-perl:
2 matches
Mail list logo
