Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

2015-09-06 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Lumin, >I will keep those custom target in the bottom of d/rules. >Yes, all of custom-target-related lines had been already >clustered at the bottom of d/rules, and I have drew a big >split line at the beginning of them, in the updated version. wonderful! > >The custom stuff is

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

2015-09-05 Thread lumin
On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 17:14 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi again, > > The package doesn't build in a clean environment. > > http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/caffe/0.~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1/buildlog Well, I am surprised source Caffe suffers FTBFS on

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

2015-09-05 Thread lumin
Hi Gianfranco Costamagna, On Fri, 2015-09-04 at 17:04 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > if they aren't called by standard dh calls it is fine to keep them there. > > maybe just move to the bottom, (I think they are already there) I will keep those custom target in the bottom of d/rules.

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

2015-09-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi again, The package doesn't build in a clean environment. http://debomatic-amd64.debian.net/distribution#experimental/caffe/0.~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1/buildlog cheers, G.

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

2015-09-04 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Lumin >Reduced one. wonderful >Stripped all Multi-Arch: no in d/control. wonderful > >Then, how about splitting those custom target into another file? > >e.g. debian/custom >$ debian/custom cpu >$ debian/custom cuda if they aren't called by standard dh calls it is fine to keep them

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

2015-09-04 Thread lumin
Hi, I've uploaded updated Caffe to mentors. http://mentors.debian.net/package/caffe On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 15:13 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > libboost-all-dev (>= 1.55) | libboost1.55-all-dev (>= 1.55), > what is the rationale for that? I guess libboost-all-dev is already enough...

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

2015-09-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Lumin, Can you please start by fixing the lintian warnings on mentors page? thanks :) G.

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

2015-09-03 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, control: libboost-all-dev (>= 1.55) | libboost1.55-all-dev (>= 1.55), what is the rationale for that? I guess libboost-all-dev is already enough... Multi-Arch: no isn't that the default? "Pre-Depends: ${misc:Pre-Depends}" this should be useless rules: --builddirectory= can be

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

2015-09-03 Thread lumin
Hi Gianfranco Costamagna, On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 13:41 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Can you please start by fixing the lintian warnings on mentors page? Now caffe is lintian clean. and I've stripped some lines in dch. Please have a look at it. :-) Thanks.

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

2015-09-03 Thread lumin
On Thu, 2015-09-03 at 15:13 +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi, > > control: > > libboost-all-dev (>= 1.55) | libboost1.55-all-dev (>= 1.55), > what is the rationale for that? I guess libboost-all-dev is already enough... I've removed libboost1.55-all-dev (>= 1.55) locally. >

Bug#797898: RFS: caffe/0.9999~rc2+git20150902+e8e660d3-1 [ITP]

2015-09-03 Thread lumin
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org, debian-ment...@lists.debian.org, 788...@bugs.debian.org Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "caffe" * Package name: caffe Version :