: Grigori Fursin ; Lucas Nussbaum ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
Hi Grigori, the RFS is already fine and you are just missing the ITP.
ITP means "I want to package this foo for Debian"
and you close it in your changelog
RFS (this bug #799268) mea
Nussbaum ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
Hi Grigori, the RFS is already fine and you are just missing the ITP.
ITP means "I want to package this foo for Debian"
and you close it in your changelog
RFS (this bug #799268) means: I want to find a sponso
ostamagna ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
On 07/11/15 at 16:21 +0100, Grigori Fursin wrote:
> Hi Gianfranco,
>
> After hacking various guides I managed to update python-ck
> based on what you mentioned:
>
> >https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck
: Gianfranco Costamagna ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
On 07/11/15 at 16:21 +0100, Grigori Fursin wrote:
Hi Gianfranco,
After hacking various guides I managed to update python-ck
based on what you mentioned:
>https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck
>t
On 07/11/15 at 16:21 +0100, Grigori Fursin wrote:
> Hi Gianfranco,
>
> After hacking various guides I managed to update python-ck
> based on what you mentioned:
>
> >https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck
> >this is a nack for me.
> >
> >You can build two binaries with the same source pack
Hi Gianfranco,
After hacking various guides I managed to update python-ck
based on what you mentioned:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck
this is a nack for me.
You can build two binaries with the same source package, look e.g. to
https://sources.debian.net/src/python-esmre/0.3.1-3/
4:03 PM
To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Lucas Nussbaum
Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
Hi Grigori,
By the way, I also uploaded python3-ck:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck
this is a nack for me.
You can build two binaries with the same source package
Hi Grigori,
>By the way, I also uploaded python3-ck:
>https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck
this is a nack for me.
You can build two binaries with the same source package, look e.g. to
https://sources.debian.net/src/python-esmre/0.3.1-3/
this includes:
compat level --> 9
debhelper >=
ed python3-ck:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck
Thanks a lot for your help,
Grigori
-Original Message-
From: Gianfranco Costamagna
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 10:38 AM
To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
You need to o
and not 'python-ck'?
Is there a way to change it?
Thanks a lot and have a good week,
Grigori
-Original Message-
From: Grigori Fursin
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 11:18 AM
To: Gianfranco Costamagna ; Lucas Nussbaum ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#799268: RFS
magna
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 10:21 AM
To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
Hi,
https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control
retitle is the keyword :)
cheers,
G.
Il Lunedì 28 Settembre 2015 10:15, Grigori Fursin
ha scritto:
Dea
nks a lot and have a good week,
Grigori
-Original Message-
From: Grigori Fursin
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 11:18 AM
To: Gianfranco Costamagna ; Lucas Nussbaum ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
Actually, it's done more or less like t
tamagna ; Lucas Nussbaum ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
Actually, it's done more or less like that.
ck is a batch script that sets environment and calls python module.
So, it should be easy to change the name if will be required.
However, I made some
ssage-
From: Lucas Nussbaum
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 3:49 PM
To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
On 18/09/15 at 12:25 +0200, Grigori Fursin wrote:
Hi Lucas,
Thank you very much for your time to check it - really appreciated!
And sorry for som
al Message-
From: Gianfranco Costamagna
Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:02 PM
To: Lucas Nussbaum ; Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
Oh, I didn't know that :( . Will it really be a problem (I didn't see any
tool called ck yet)?
>
>> Oh, I didn't know that :( . Will it really be a problem (I didn't see any
>> tool called ck yet)? The problem is that our users now share some artifacts
>> in this format and they use this name (in scripts or internal calls),
>> so changing this name now will be a nightmare :( ...
>
>I'm not
On 18/09/15 at 12:25 +0200, Grigori Fursin wrote:
> Hi Lucas,
>
> Thank you very much for your time to check it - really appreciated!
> And sorry for some mix ups - it's my first time trying to package
> something for Debian ;) ...
>
> >Must be fixed:
> -> Given that this software is not specific
Hi Lucas,
Thank you very much for your time to check it - really appreciated!
And sorry for some mix ups - it's my first time trying to package
something for Debian ;) ...
Must be fixed:
-> Given that this software is not specific to Debian, and publishes
releases on its homepage, this should
Sorry for mixing this up and thanks again for your help...
Grigori
-Original Message-
From: Lucas Nussbaum
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 10:44 PM
To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Cc: Ghislain Vaillant ; cont...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP
On 17/09/15 at 12:43 +0200, Grigori Fursin wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ck"
>
> * Package name: ck
> Version : 1.6.2
> Upstream Author : Grigori Fursin
> * URL : http://gi
t
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 1:40 PM
> To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
>
> You can delete it and retitle this bug report [1] with the new source
> package name.
>
> [1] https://wiki.debian.org/HowtoUseBTS
&g
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 1:40 PM
To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
You can delete it and retitle this bug report [1] with the new source
package name.
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/HowtoUseBTS
Ghislain
On 17/09/15 12:37, Grig
,
Grigori
-Original Message-
From: Ghislain Vaillant
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 1:09 PM
To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
On 17/09/15 11:43, Grigori Fursin wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear
; 799...@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]
On 17/09/15 11:43, Grigori Fursin wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ck"
* Package name: ck
Version : 1.6.2
Upstream Author
On 17/09/15 11:43, Grigori Fursin wrote:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ck"
* Package name: ck
Version : 1.6.2
Upstream Author : Grigori Fursin
* URL : http://github.com/ctuning/ck
* License
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ck"
* Package name: ck
Version : 1.6.2
Upstream Author : Grigori Fursin
* URL : http://github.com/ctuning/ck
* License : BSD-3-clause
Section :
26 matches
Mail list logo
