Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

uesday, November 10, 2015 10:17 AM To: Grigori Fursin ; Lucas Nussbaum ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] Hi Grigori, the RFS is already fine and you are just missing the ITP. ITP means "I want to package this foo for Debian" and you close it in you

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

Nussbaum ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] Hi Grigori, the RFS is already fine and you are just missing the ITP. ITP means "I want to package this foo for Debian" and you close it in your changelog RFS (this bug #799268) means: I want to find a sponso

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

: Gianfranco Costamagna ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] On 07/11/15 at 16:21 +0100, Grigori Fursin wrote: Hi Gianfranco, After hacking various guides I managed to update python-ck based on what you mentioned: >https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

Cc: Gianfranco Costamagna ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] On 07/11/15 at 16:21 +0100, Grigori Fursin wrote: > Hi Gianfranco, > > After hacking various guides I managed to update python-ck > based on what you mentioned: > > >https://

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

On 07/11/15 at 16:21 +0100, Grigori Fursin wrote: > Hi Gianfranco, > > After hacking various guides I managed to update python-ck > based on what you mentioned: > > >https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck > >this is a nack for me. > > > >You can build two binaries with the same source

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

Hi Gianfranco, After hacking various guides I managed to update python-ck based on what you mentioned: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck this is a nack for me. You can build two binaries with the same source package, look e.g. to

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

4:03 PM To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Cc: Lucas Nussbaum Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] Hi Grigori, By the way, I also uploaded python3-ck: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck this is a nack for me. You can build two binaries with the same source package

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

Hi Grigori, >By the way, I also uploaded python3-ck: >https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck this is a nack for me. You can build two binaries with the same source package, look e.g. to https://sources.debian.net/src/python-esmre/0.3.1-3/ this includes: compat level --> 9 debhelper >=

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

ange it? Thanks a lot and have a good week, Grigori -Original Message- From: Grigori Fursin Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2015 11:18 AM To: Gianfranco Costamagna ; Lucas Nussbaum ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] Actually, it's done more or less like tha

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

baum ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] Actually, it's done more or less like that. ck is a batch script that sets environment and calls python module. So, it should be easy to change the name if will be required. However, I made some search and didn't not fi

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

nday, September 28, 2015 10:21 AM To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] Hi, https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control retitle is the keyword :) cheers, G. Il Lunedì 28 Settembre 2015 10:15, Grigori Fursin <grigori.fur...@ctuning.org> ha

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

15 10:21 AM To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] Hi, https://www.debian.org/Bugs/server-control retitle is the keyword :) cheers, G. Il Lunedì 28 Settembre 2015 10:15, Grigori Fursin <grigori.fur...@ctuning.org> ha scritto: Dear colleagues, I f

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

-ck: https://mentors.debian.net/package/python3-ck Thanks a lot for your help, Grigori -Original Message- From: Gianfranco Costamagna Sent: Monday, September 28, 2015 10:38 AM To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] You need to open an ITP

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

- From: Gianfranco Costamagna Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 4:02 PM To: Lucas Nussbaum ; Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] Oh, I didn't know that :( . Will it really be a problem (I didn't see any tool called ck yet)? The problem

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

- From: Lucas Nussbaum Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 3:49 PM To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] On 18/09/15 at 12:25 +0200, Grigori Fursin wrote: Hi Lucas, Thank you very much for your time to check it - really appreciated! And sorry for some mix

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

Sorry for mixing this up and thanks again for your help... Grigori -Original Message- From: Lucas Nussbaum Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 10:44 PM To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Cc: Ghislain Vaillant ; cont...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

Hi Lucas, Thank you very much for your time to check it - really appreciated! And sorry for some mix ups - it's my first time trying to package something for Debian ;) ... Must be fixed: -> Given that this software is not specific to Debian, and publishes releases on its homepage, this

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

> >> Oh, I didn't know that :( . Will it really be a problem (I didn't see any >> tool called ck yet)? The problem is that our users now share some artifacts >> in this format and they use this name (in scripts or internal calls), >> so changing this name now will be a nightmare :( ... > >I'm not

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

On 18/09/15 at 12:25 +0200, Grigori Fursin wrote: > Hi Lucas, > > Thank you very much for your time to check it - really appreciated! > And sorry for some mix ups - it's my first time trying to package > something for Debian ;) ... > > >Must be fixed: > -> Given that this software is not

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] On 17/09/15 11:43, Grigori Fursin wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ck" * Package name: ck Version : 1.6.2 Upstream Author

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

, Grigori -Original Message- From: Ghislain Vaillant Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 1:09 PM To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] On 17/09/15 11:43, Grigori Fursin wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

On 17/09/15 11:43, Grigori Fursin wrote: Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ck" * Package name: ck Version : 1.6.2 Upstream Author : Grigori Fursin * URL :

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ck" * Package name: ck Version : 1.6.2 Upstream Author : Grigori Fursin * URL : http://github.com/ctuning/ck * License :

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

ursday, September 17, 2015 1:40 PM To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] You can delete it and retitle this bug report [1] with the new source package name. [1] https://wiki.debian.org/HowtoUseBTS Ghislain On 17/09/15 12:37, Grigori Fursin

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

; Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2015 1:40 PM > To: Grigori Fursin ; 799...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP] > > You can delete it and retitle this bug report [1] with the new source > package name. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/HowtoUseBTS > > G

Bug#799268: RFS: ck/1.6.2 [ITP]

On 17/09/15 at 12:43 +0200, Grigori Fursin wrote: > Package: sponsorship-requests > Severity: wishlist > > Dear mentors, > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "ck" > > * Package name: ck > Version : 1.6.2 > Upstream Author : Grigori Fursin >