Hi Andreas,
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:36:36AM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2015-09-30 18:41, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> > I'll try to remember to add back the support in the next backport. It's
> > a trivial change :-)
>
> This was re-enabled in 340.93-3~bpo8+1 which I just uploaded.
Than
On 2015-09-30 18:41, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> I'll try to remember to add back the support in the next backport. It's
> a trivial change :-)
This was re-enabled in 340.93-3~bpo8+1 which I just uploaded.
Andreas
On 2015-09-27 15:04, Beck, Andre wrote:
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> please note that
>
> * nvidia-kernel-*: [i386] Drop support for building amd64 kernel modules.
>
> from 340.76-5 also hits 340.76-5~bpo8+1 from jessie-backports, which
> might be considered a regression. In my case, I was running 3
Dear Maintainers,
please note that
* nvidia-kernel-*: [i386] Drop support for building amd64 kernel modules.
from 340.76-5 also hits 340.76-5~bpo8+1 from jessie-backports, which
might be considered a regression. In my case, I was running 340.76-2
(manually "backported" to jessie from unstable,
On Thu, 24 Sep 2015 23:07:03 +0200 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 2015-09-24 20:02, Mert Dirik wrote:
> > Please consider bringing the support back for the -amd64 variant.
>
> That [sc]hould work with nvidia-kernel-dkms:amd64.
>
If I understand correctly, you recommend installing
"nvidia-driver nv
On 2015-09-24 20:02, Mert Dirik wrote:
> I noticed recent versions of nvidia-graphics-drivers has dropped the support
> for building amd64 kernel modules when DKMS build for it failed.
>
> Using the -amd64 kernel variant on i386 architecture provides best of both
> worlds with regards to software
Source: nvidia-graphics-drivers
Version: 340.76-5
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I noticed recent versions of nvidia-graphics-drivers has dropped the support
for building amd64 kernel modules when DKMS build for it failed.
Using the -amd64 kernel variant on i386 architecture provides best of
7 matches
Mail list logo
