Bug#800509: LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?

2016-02-26 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi, >So basically there's ghc and gambas3 left. > >ghc is using 3.7 in experimental, so it will be fixed with the next haskell >transition. true, even if some talks about embedding some llvm code in the source code :) (rationale is: used only for building and only for arm*) >Unfortunately I

Bug#800509: LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?

2016-02-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 30/09/15 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-debbugs-cc: sylves...@debian.org > > On 30/09/15 09:52, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Le 11/08/2015 11:10, Sylvestre

Bug#800509: LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?

2015-11-24 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 22/11/15 23:26, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > Dear release team, > > afl-clang is also involved in this transition, as it depends on: > clang (<< 1:3.6), clang (>= 1:3.5) > > Hence it is currently uninstallable in sid, which was reported as #804852. Thanks for catching that. I have updated the

Bug#800509: LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?

2015-11-22 Thread Andreas Cadhalpun
Dear release team, afl-clang is also involved in this transition, as it depends on: clang (<< 1:3.6), clang (>= 1:3.5) Hence it is currently uninstallable in sid, which was reported as #804852. After a no-change-rebuild in current sid, these dependencies change to: clang (<< 1:3.7), clang (>=

Bug#800509: LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?

2015-11-01 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 01/11/2015 12:11, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > On 11/10/15 14:14, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: >> Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released. The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 once 3.7.1 is released (in one or two

Bug#800509: LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?

2015-11-01 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 11/10/15 14:14, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : >> >>> FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released. >>> The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 once 3.7.1 is >>> released (in one or two months) >>> or the fun way would be to skip 3.6 in the

Bug#800509: LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?

2015-10-11 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le 30/09/2015 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : > >> FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released. >> The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 once 3.7.1 is >> released (in one or two months) >> or the fun way would be to skip 3.6 in the transition. >> I would prefer the first option but

Bug#800509: LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?

2015-09-30 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-debbugs-cc: sylves...@debian.org On 30/09/15 09:52, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Hello, > > Le 11/08/2015 11:10, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> I am planning to update