Bug#800797: docbook-utils: please generate reproducible manpages

2016-07-04 Thread Reiner Herrmann
On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 01:19:44PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote: > Would it make sense to force the C locale only if SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH is > set to not modify existing behaviour? Otherwise I'm all for an NMU. Yes, that makes sense. I attached an updated patch, which behaves as before if

Bug#800797: docbook-utils: please generate reproducible manpages

2016-07-03 Thread Guido Günther
On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 07:31:04PM +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote: > Source: docbook-utils > Version: 0.6.14-3 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: toolchain timestamps locale > X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org >

Bug#800797: docbook-utils: please generate reproducible manpages

2016-06-03 Thread intrigeri
Hi Debian XML/SGML Group! Reiner Herrmann wrote (03 Oct 2015 17:31:04 GMT) : > While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed > that docbook-utils doesn't generate reproducible manpages. > The embedded timestamp is using the build date and also varies depending > on the

Bug#800797: docbook-utils: please generate reproducible manpages

2015-10-03 Thread Reiner Herrmann
Source: docbook-utils Version: 0.6.14-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: toolchain timestamps locale X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed that