Bug#801307: ITP: pybtex-docutils -- A docutils backend for pybtex

Hi Sandro On 18:35 17/10, Sandro Tosi wrote: > I think you should consider packaging it under DPMT as it has > potential (and even real) applications in other packages. of course > seqan belongs to deb-med, I do think that a general py module should > belong to a general py module team. > OK,

Bug#801307: ITP: pybtex-docutils -- A docutils backend for pybtex

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Kevin Murray wrote: > Hi Sandro > > On 18:35 17/10, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> I think you should consider packaging it under DPMT as it has >> potential (and even real) applications in other packages. of course >> seqan belongs to deb-med, I do

Bug#801307: ITP: pybtex-docutils -- A docutils backend for pybtex

I think you should consider packaging it under DPMT as it has potential (and even real) applications in other packages. of course seqan belongs to deb-med, I do think that a general py module should belong to a general py module team. On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Kevin Murray

Bug#801307: ITP: pybtex-docutils -- A docutils backend for pybtex

Hi Sandro, On 12:47 08/10, Sandro Tosi wrote: [...] > > > > This package will be co-maintained with the Debian Med team. > > why in Deb Med team and not a more general python team like DPMT? It > doesnt look like it has anything specific to "med" > My rationale is that no-one in such teams has

Bug#801307: ITP: pybtex-docutils -- A docutils backend for pybtex

Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Kevin Murray * Package name: pybtex-docutils Version : 0.2.1 Upstream Author : Matthias C. M. Troffaes * URL : https://github.com/mcmtroffaes/pybtex-docutils * License : Expat Programming Lang:

Bug#801307: ITP: pybtex-docutils -- A docutils backend for pybtex

On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Kevin Murray wrote: > Package: wnpp > Severity: wishlist > Owner: Kevin Murray > > * Package name: pybtex-docutils > Version : 0.2.1 > Upstream Author : Matthias C. M. Troffaes > * URL :