On Thu, 24 Mar 2016 14:14:21 +0100 Baptiste Jonglez wrote: > As a side note, the current state of unison/ocaml on stretch is confusing: > ocaml 4.02.3 is in stretch, but the unison binary package still seems to > be built against ocaml 4.01. This is non-obvious and I spent quite some > time wondering why unison from stretch did not interoperate with another > unison client built against ocaml 4.02.
I encountered this problem again (syncing between stretch and another OS with the same version of unison leads to a crash). At least one additional person got confused because of this same issue, see #823148 Stéphane, do you think it's acceptable to rebuild unison in stretch using ocaml 4.02.3? Or is /status quo/ the best compromise so far? Thanks, Baptiste