Hi Gianfranco,
On 10/29/2015 04:03 PM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> > Indeed, that's how it is supposed to be. I have to check why it is
> > not in included anymore.
>
>
> because between 3.0.2 [1] and 3.0.7 [2] you took over the swig package
> from swig2.0, without adding the links file [3]
>
Hi Torsten,
>Thanks, that's actually what I expected to find. I am sure that I did
>copy the links control file to the new swig sources.
>Sometimes the difference between a working and a broken package is
>running svn add :-)
oh well, almost everyday I have to tell my colleagues to remember
On 10/29/2015 11:33 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Shouldn't the swig package provides a symlink to the executable of the
> stable release?
>
> swig -> swig3.0
Indeed, that's how it is supposed to be. I have to check why it is not
in included anymore.
Thanks for the Feedback,
Torsten
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:29:33 +0100 Torsten Landschoff
wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 11:33 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> > Shouldn't the swig package provides a symlink to the executable of the
> > stable release?
> >
> > swig -> swig3.0
> Indeed, that's how it is supposed to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi,
On Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:29:33 +0100 Torsten Landschoff
wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 11:33 AM, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
>> Shouldn't the swig package provides a symlink to the executable
>> of the stable release?
>>
>> swig
Package: swig
Version: 3.0.7-1
Severity: normal
Hi,
Shouldn't the swig package provides a symlink to the executable of the
stable release?
swig -> swig3.0
Cheers,
Laurent Bigonville
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1,
Well I should have said, "please reintroduce the symlink"
It seems that it has been dropped somewhere during the upgrade to 3.0
Cheers,
Laurent Bigonville
7 matches
Mail list logo