Control: forwarded -1 https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126682/#review90866
Hi Diane,
On 11.01.2016 20:34, Diane Trout wrote:
> Any chance you could weigh in on this KDE review? It's where I forwarded your
> patch to upstream.
>
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126682/#review90866
Thanks
Hello,
Any chance you could weigh in on this KDE review? It's where I forwarded your
patch to upstream.
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126682/#review90866
Diane
Hi Diane,
On 10.01.2016 01:12, Diane Trout wrote:
> After I emailed you I found the KDE bug that the musicbrainz tagging was
> crashing on https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328359
>
> Also it appears they fixed that bug in git master. After building that I was
> able to view tags, so I
On 09.01.2016 07:10, Diane Trout wrote:
>>> though I'd ike to build and run it first.
>>
>> That's always a good idea.
>
> Ok I built it and ran it and I think I tested the chunk of code that you
> modified and it crashed.
Thanks for runtime testing this!
> However I then ran the version
>
> Can you share a link or mark this bug as forwarded?
> If the crash is related to FFmpeg functionality, I might be able to help.
After I emailed you I found the KDE bug that the musicbrainz tagging was
crashing on https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328359
Also it appears they fixed that
Hi Diane,
On 08.01.2016 08:47, Diane Trout wrote:
> No I hadn't seen the previous bug report. Thank you for emailing me directly.
Thanks for your quick reply.
> I just looked at your patch and it seems pretty simple
Yes, they are mostly search and replace, though the patch also fixes memory
> > though I'd ike to build and run it first.
>
> That's always a good idea.
Ok I built it and ran it and I think I tested the chunk of code that you
modified and it crashed.
However I then ran the version without your patch and it also crashed, so I'm
going to send your patch to upstream
On Thursday, January 07, 2016 11:13:45 PM Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> the next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this month
> (and it might be called 3.0 instead of 2.9).
>
> Since I haven't heard back from you during the past two month
> I'm wondering what the
Dear Maintainer,
the next version of FFmpeg is planned to be released this month
(and it might be called 3.0 instead of 2.9).
Since I haven't heard back from you during the past two month
I'm wondering what the status of this bug is:
* Are you aware of the patch I provided?
* Do you plan an
Package: amarok
Version: 2.8.0-3
Severity: important
Tags: patch
User: pkg-multimedia-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ffmpeg2.9
Dear Maintainer,
your package fails to build with the upcoming ffmpeg 2.9.
This bug will become release-critical at some point when the
ffmpeg2.9
10 matches
Mail list logo