Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Mikkel Krautz: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Chris Knadle > wrote: >> Mikkel Krautz: >>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the meta data that they are using

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Kurt Roeckx: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:25:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: >> Quoting Kurt Roeckx: >>> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >>> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at >>> the same time and you wouldn't get into this situation

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Mikkel Krautz: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Mikkel Krautz: >>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the meta data that they are using

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:25:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > Quoting Kurt Roeckx: > > I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the > > meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at > > the same time and you wouldn't get into this situation that they > >

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 6:20 PM, Chris Knadle wrote: > Mikkel Krautz: >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >>> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >>> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Chris Knadle wrote: > Mikkel Krautz: >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >>> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >>> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Mikkel Krautz: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at >> the same time and you wouldn't get into this situation that they >> are

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Chris Knadle: > Mikkel Krautz: >[...] > When a new OpenSSL comes down containing a library rename, the Mumble #2124 > patch will disallow multiple libssl/libcrypto load and Mumble will break. > Besides Mumble not being functional, the broken behavior deletes the user's > SSL key used with Mumble

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Mikkel Krautz: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at >> the same time and you wouldn't get into this situation that they >> are

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:55:54PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: >> >> A tiny bit of

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:55:54PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > >> A tiny bit of follow-up to my suggestion of using "-openssl-linked" for Qt: > >> > >> In the

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: >> A tiny bit of follow-up to my suggestion of using "-openssl-linked" for Qt: >> >> In the earlier Debian bug that was linked by Chris, it was brought up >> that

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 03:28:30PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > A tiny bit of follow-up to my suggestion of using "-openssl-linked" for Qt: > > In the earlier Debian bug that was linked by Chris, it was brought up > that an application may use QtNetwork without using SSL, and therefore > might

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 3:22 PM, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: >> I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the >> meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at >> the same time

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > I would also like to say again that if we can somehow see in the > meta data that they are using libssl, they would get rebuild at > the same time and you wouldn't get into this situation that they > are using a different

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 01:57:23PM +0100, Mikkel Krautz wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:56:22PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > >> > Maybe Qt should have some way to indicate what version it's build > >> > against so that we

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 11:38 AM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:04:12AM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Discussions with mumble upstream about this problem have continued, and the >> situation seems much more muddied than I previously knew. This is likely >> not

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 8:06 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:56:22PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> > Maybe Qt should have some way to indicate what version it's build >> > against so that we can binNMU it with all the other packages? Or >> > maybe Qt should

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 04:56:22PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > > Maybe Qt should have some way to indicate what version it's build > > against so that we can binNMU it with all the other packages? Or > > maybe Qt should just link against it, instead of doing dlopen()? > > Mumble upstream

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Kurt Roeckx: > On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:04:12AM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Discussions with mumble upstream about this problem have continued, and the >> situation seems much more muddied than I previously knew. This is likely >> not an OpenSSL issue per se but rather seems to be an issue

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sat, Mar 12, 2016 at 01:04:12AM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > Discussions with mumble upstream about this problem have continued, and the > situation seems much more muddied than I previously knew. This is likely > not an OpenSSL issue per se but rather seems to be an issue whenever OpenSSL >

Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Discussions with mumble upstream about this problem have continued, and the situation seems much more muddied than I previously knew. This is likely not an OpenSSL issue per se but rather seems to be an issue whenever OpenSSL ships renamed libssl and libcrypto files for soname changes. Mumble

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:36:46PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > Kurt Roeckx: > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > >> > >> Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized > >> before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened #804487 is to try

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > > Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized > before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened #804487 is to try to figure > out /what/ caused mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 to break, when mumble_1.2.10-2 works. >

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:26:42PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: > Package: openssl > Version: 1.0.2d-3 > Severity: serious > > Greetings. > > I'm marking this bug as 'serious' because the upgrade to 1.0.2d-3 seems to > have broken mumble, though it's unclear why that would be. > > After a binNMU

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Kurt Roeckx: > On Sun, Nov 08, 2015 at 10:26:42PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Package: openssl >> Version: 1.0.2d-3 >> Severity: serious >> >> Greetings. >> >> I'm marking this bug as 'serious' because the upgrade to 1.0.2d-3 seems to >> have broken mumble, though it's unclear why that would be.

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Kurt Roeckx: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> >> Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized >> before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened #804487 is to try to figure >> out /what/ caused mumble_1.2.10-2+b1 to break, when

Bug#804487: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Kurt Roeckx: > On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 09:36:46PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: >> Kurt Roeckx: >>> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 07:58:30PM +, Chris Knadle wrote: Everybody dealing with the mumble bug agrees that SSL should be initialized before making SSL calls -- the reason I opened

Bug#804487: openssl_1.0.2d-3 breaks mumble and mumble-server after binNMU

Package: openssl Version: 1.0.2d-3 Severity: serious Greetings. I'm marking this bug as 'serious' because the upgrade to 1.0.2d-3 seems to have broken mumble, though it's unclear why that would be. After a binNMU with openssl_1.0.2d-3 mumble and mumble-server are unable to find the available