On 28.11.2015 07:12, Helmut Grohne wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 02:58:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
No. Why would you handle hppa as a secondary or ternary architecture? You
need the hppa64 cross compiler to bootstrap hppa. Other architectures
require a multilib enabled compiler to bootst
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 02:58:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> No. Why would you handle hppa as a secondary or ternary architecture? You
> need the hppa64 cross compiler to bootstrap hppa. Other architectures
> require a multilib enabled compiler to bootstrap the architecture, however
> hppa/hp
On 27.11.2015 20:54, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Source: gcc-5
Version: 5.2.1-26
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi Matthias,
When building cross compilers targeting amd64, i386 or x32 by writing
the arch name to debian/target, the build process tries to buil
Source: gcc-5
Version: 5.2.1-26
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertags: rebootstrap
Hi Matthias,
When building cross compilers targeting amd64, i386 or x32 by writing
the arch name to debian/target, the build process tries to build hppa64
cross compilers. This seems a bit o
4 matches
Mail list logo