Bug#806479: gcc-5: please allow building cross compilers targeting x86 cpus without building hppa64 cross compilers

2015-11-28 Thread Matthias Klose
On 28.11.2015 07:12, Helmut Grohne wrote: On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 02:58:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: No. Why would you handle hppa as a secondary or ternary architecture? You need the hppa64 cross compiler to bootstrap hppa. Other architectures require a multilib enabled compiler to bootst

Bug#806479: gcc-5: please allow building cross compilers targeting x86 cpus without building hppa64 cross compilers

2015-11-27 Thread Helmut Grohne
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 02:58:31AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > No. Why would you handle hppa as a secondary or ternary architecture? You > need the hppa64 cross compiler to bootstrap hppa. Other architectures > require a multilib enabled compiler to bootstrap the architecture, however > hppa/hp

Bug#806479: gcc-5: please allow building cross compilers targeting x86 cpus without building hppa64 cross compilers

2015-11-27 Thread Matthias Klose
On 27.11.2015 20:54, Helmut Grohne wrote: Source: gcc-5 Version: 5.2.1-26 Severity: minor Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap Hi Matthias, When building cross compilers targeting amd64, i386 or x32 by writing the arch name to debian/target, the build process tries to buil

Bug#806479: gcc-5: please allow building cross compilers targeting x86 cpus without building hppa64 cross compilers

2015-11-27 Thread Helmut Grohne
Source: gcc-5 Version: 5.2.1-26 Severity: minor Tags: patch User: helm...@debian.org Usertags: rebootstrap Hi Matthias, When building cross compilers targeting amd64, i386 or x32 by writing the arch name to debian/target, the build process tries to build hppa64 cross compilers. This seems a bit o