* Andreas Henriksson [Sun Jan 24, 2016 at 04:08:31AM +0100]:
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:07:03PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> > There's one question on my mind though, shouldn't the upgrade case
> > be versioned? eg. so in additional future releases you don't try to
> > divert when you've
Hello Michael Prokop.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 12:07:58AM +0100, Michael Prokop wrote:
> I've worked on a patch for file-rc which takes care of diverting the
> relevant invoke-rc.d. + update-rc.d files (following instructions as
> documented at
>
Hello again.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2016 at 10:07:03PM +0100, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
[...]
> There's one question on my mind though, shouldn't the upgrade case
> be versioned? eg. so in additional future releases you don't try to
> divert when you've already diverted. You only want the diversion to
>
* Michael Biebl [Fri Jan 22, 2016 at 03:08:32PM +0100]:
> I'm going to clone this bug report for file-rc, since it is equally
> affected.
[...]
I've worked on a patch for file-rc which takes care of diverting the
relevant invoke-rc.d. + update-rc.d files (following instructions as
documented at
4 matches
Mail list logo
