Package: wine
Version: 1.8-6
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
>From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is entirely broken. There is no
>wine-gecko packaged in Debian
(the recommendation of libwine-gecko-2.40 is unsatisfiable), no download window
appears to fetch wine-gecko
from the WineH
severity 812750 serious
thanks
Hi!
* Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]:
> >From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is entirely broken. There is no
> >wine-gecko packaged in Debian
> (the recommendation of libwine-gecko-2.40 is unsatisfiable),
From policy:
In addition, the pac
Hi
In Wine we depend on libwine-gecko-xxx before it's added to the archive,
knowing/hoping/assuming that it will be added to the archive, which has
always been true for Debian stable releases, but not for all
intermittent Gecko versions that were needed in between (maintainer is
in both cases the
Hey,
* Jens Reyer [2016-02-09 19:49:43 CET]:
> In Wine we depend on libwine-gecko-xxx before it's added to the archive,
> knowing/hoping/assuming that it will be added to the archive, which has
> always been true for Debian stable releases, but not for all
> intermittent Gecko versions that we
Hi Jens,
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:49:43 +0100, Jens Reyer wrote:
> Stephen, can you shed some light on the main problem(s) blocking
> frequent Gecko releases? Let's say, there's some chance that I help.
There are two issues:
* wine-gecko typically requires a git snapshot of mingw-w64, so supporting
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 21:06:29 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> * updating the licensing information for each new wine-gecko release is
> extraordinarily time-consuming, on the order of 150-200h per release (and
> even then I miss issues) – TBH I've stalled on this, I'm thinking of
Just to be clear,
On 02/09/2016 08:10 PM, Austin English wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2016 11:08 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
>>
>>Hi,
>>
>> * Austin English [2016-02-09 17:45:02 CET]:
>>> On Feb 9, 2016 8:39 PM, austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
* Austin English [2016-02-09 17:19:30 CET]:
> On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > severity 812750 serious
> > thanks
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]:
> > > From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is entirely broken. There
> > > is no wine-gecko p
On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
>
> severity 812750 serious
> thanks
>
> Hi!
>
> * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]:
> > >From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is entirely broken. There
is no wine-gecko packaged in Debian
> > (the recommendation of libwine-gecko-2.40
On Feb 9, 2016 8:39 PM, austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> >
> > * Austin English [2016-02-09 17:19:30 CET]:
> > > On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > > > severity 812750 serious
> > > > thanks
> > > >
> > > > Hi!
> > > >
> >
On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
>
> * Austin English [2016-02-09 17:19:30 CET]:
> > On Feb 9, 2016 8:15 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > > severity 812750 serious
> > > thanks
> > >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]:
> > > > From all I can tell, the
Hi,
* Austin English [2016-02-09 17:45:02 CET]:
> On Feb 9, 2016 8:39 PM, austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > > > > Hi!
> > > > >
> > > > > * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:49 CET]:
> > > > > > From all I can tell, the Gecko integration is
On Feb 9, 2016 11:08 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
>
>Hi,
>
> * Austin English [2016-02-09 17:45:02 CET]:
> > On Feb 9, 2016 8:39 PM, austinengl...@gmail.com wrote:
> > > On Feb 9, 2016 8:25 PM, "Rhonda D'Vine" wrote:
> > > > > > Hi!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Ralf Jung [2016-01-26 10:57:
On 02/09/2016 08:14 PM, Rhonda D'Vine wrote:
> Unfortunately unsatisfyable recommends are a policy violation though,
> and even while I understand the sentiments of not wanting to have to
> reupload wine to add it, I don't see a way around this.
[...]
>> Rhonda, do you see any flexibility in inter
14 matches
Mail list logo