Bug#815400: transition: ros-ros-comm

On 24/02/16 23:20, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: * Emilio Pozuelo Monfort [2016-02-24 18:25]: Looks like some packages are failing to build. Can you take a look? I've pushed fixes for everything, but now we got bitten by the new urdfdom version and #815814. That's sorted.

Bug#815400: transition: ros-ros-comm

On 23/02/16 22:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 23/02/16 15:24, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Thanks for the quick confirmation. I've uploaded the package to unstable >> and pushed one rdepends which wouldn't build oherwise. Can someone start >> the binNMUs or do I need to do

Bug#815400: transition: ros-ros-comm

On 23/02/16 15:24, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks for the quick confirmation. I've uploaded the package to unstable > and pushed one rdepends which wouldn't build oherwise. Can someone start > the binNMUs or do I need to do something else? Scheduled. Emilio

Bug#815400: transition: ros-ros-comm

Hi, Thanks for the quick confirmation. I've uploaded the package to unstable and pushed one rdepends which wouldn't build oherwise. Can someone start the binNMUs or do I need to do something else? Cheers Jochen signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#815400: transition: ros-ros-comm

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 21/02/16 10:09, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi, > > we want to transition librosconsole to link against log4cxx instead of an > internal print

Bug#815400: transition: ros-ros-comm

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, we want to transition librosconsole to link against log4cxx instead of an internal print version. librosconsole exports these symbols, so other packages depend on the choice and we