On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:59:13 +0100, chrysn wrote:
> version 0.1.9 that fixes this is released, i'm just waiting for sponsor
> review for 0.1.9-1 to hit the archive. a "Breaks: arandr (<< 0.1.9)"
> would avoid creating broken systems in testing. (afaik it wouldn't
> impede testing migration,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 07:43:14PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
> ewww. I don't think xrandr's output is really suitable for machine
> consumption. Can't you use the libXrandr API directly?
arandr is more of an editor for shell scripts that invoke xrandr --
executing a saved arandr file works
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:57:13 +0100, chrysn wrote:
> hi kristof,
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:05:16AM +0100, Kristof Csillag wrote:
> > Lately, xrandr has been updated to v1.5:
> >
> > user@host:~$ xrandr --version
> > xrandr program version 1.5.0
> > Server reports RandR version 1.5
hi kristof,
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:05:16AM +0100, Kristof Csillag wrote:
> Lately, xrandr has been updated to v1.5:
>
> user@host:~$ xrandr --version
> xrandr program version 1.5.0
> Server reports RandR version 1.5
>
> arandr doesn't like that at all:
thanks for spotting this, i'm
Package: arandr
Version: 0.1.8-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Lately, xrandr has been updated to v1.5:
user@host:~$ xrandr --version
xrandr program version 1.5.0
Server reports RandR version 1.5
arandr doesn't like that at all:
user@host:~$ arandr
Traceback
5 matches
Mail list logo
