Bug#815833: Fake-hwclock: consider mtime of root (/) if no saved file

2016-03-01 Thread Roddy Shuler
Perfect! Thanks for your suggestion, Steve. That does sound like a cleaner solution than what I had proposed. Roddy On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 5:28 PM Steve McIntyre wrote: > Hi Roddy, and thanks for getting in touch! > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:27:26PM +, Roddy Shuler wrote: > >Package:

Bug#815833: Fake-hwclock: consider mtime of root (/) if no saved file

2016-02-29 Thread Steve McIntyre
Hi Roddy, and thanks for getting in touch! On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 09:27:26PM +, Roddy Shuler wrote: >Package: fake-hwclock >Version: 0.9 > >Upon first use of fake-hwclock, if the device does not have a >battery-backed clock (and has not saved fake-hwclock.data yet), the clock >will typically

Bug#815833: Fake-hwclock: consider mtime of root (/) if no saved file

2016-02-24 Thread Roddy Shuler
Package: fake-hwclock Version: 0.9 Upon first use of fake-hwclock, if the device does not have a battery-backed clock (and has not saved fake-hwclock.data yet), the clock will typically start at Jan 1, 1970 UTC. This has the following repercussions: - Before manually adjusting the time, it will b