Bug#806716: Bug#819016: jellyfish: Rename python bindings module name

2016-09-01 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
Hello Andreas, > at first thanks a lot for all your patches and specifically the patience > you had since I was simply waiting for the next upstream version to take > action on this issue. Since upstream has now released 2.2.6 I was > updating the package, applied the patches and uploaded (but

Bug#806716: Bug#819016: jellyfish: Rename python bindings module name

2016-08-30 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Diego, at first thanks a lot for all your patches and specifically the patience you had since I was simply waiting for the next upstream version to take action on this issue. Since upstream has now released 2.2.6 I was updating the package, applied the patches and uploaded (but it will need

Bug#819016: jellyfish: Rename python bindings module name

2016-07-09 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
Hello Andreas, following the latest discussion at #806716 [1], I'm attaching a patch that is intended to replace the "update-debian-rules-dh_clean.patch" on the first message of this bug report, and be used in conjunction with the "rename-python-module-to-dna_jellyfish.patch". Hopefully both of

Bug#819016: jellyfish: Rename python bindings module name

2016-04-13 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
Hello Andreas, I dropped by #debian-python yesterday in order to clarify conformance to Python Policy 3.3 as suggested during a review on the ITP [1], and the conversation derived into a suggestion about revisiting the decision we made about the package names (excerpt from the log [2]): Apr 12

Bug#819016: jellyfish: Rename python bindings module name

2016-03-28 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
Hello Andreas, > I need to admit I'm in favour of running any test at build time as well > as in an autopkgtest (see Debian Continuous Integration) as far as it is > sensible. So if it turns out that parts of the test suite can not > sensibly be run under every condition only this part should be

Bug#819016: jellyfish: Rename python bindings module name

2016-03-27 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Diego, thanks for diving into this. On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 07:09:18PM +0100, Diego M. Rodriguez wrote: > After some more testing, I'm wondering if it would be sensible to just > *not* aim for having the python tests run during pybuild, and instead > stick to running them on a separate stage

Bug#819016: jellyfish: Rename python bindings module name

2016-03-25 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
After some more testing, I'm wondering if it would be sensible to just *not* aim for having the python tests run during pybuild, and instead stick to running them on a separate stage (or during autopkgtest, which I have not ventured into yet). The main reason is that one of the tests

Bug#819016: jellyfish: Rename python bindings module name

2016-03-23 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
An update on the python tests running, not as exhaustive as I'd like due to having less time available than initially expected: upon closer inspection, I believe that indeed the python tests at swig/python/test*.py are not being currently run during the build, as hinted on the previous message.

Bug#819016: jellyfish: Rename python bindings module name

2016-03-22 Thread Diego M. Rodriguez
Source: jellyfish Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, after a discussion with Andreas Tille [1], I'm wondering if it would be possible to rename the python module of the python bindings from "jellyfish" to "dna_jellyfish", in order to avoid conflicts with an existing PyPI [2] package, which is