Bug#820486: I follow aptitude's advice and end up with a broken (B) package

2016-04-26 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Control: close -1 2016-04-23 18:25 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson: retitle 820486 be sure CLI shows same amount of info as curses for broken packages thanks MAFM> The curses interface says why the package is broken, I am not sure if MAFM> cmdline's "why" does the same, but

Bug#820486: I follow aptitude's advice and end up with a broken (B) package

2016-04-23 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
retitle 820486 be sure CLI shows same amount of info as curses for broken packages thanks MAFM> The curses interface says why the package is broken, I am not sure if MAFM> cmdline's "why" does the same, but without knowing the source of the MAFM> problem not much can be done. OK, maybe just be

Bug#820486: I follow aptitude's advice and end up with a broken (B) package

2016-04-21 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, 2016-04-09 00:24 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson: Package: aptitude Version: 0.7.8-1 I follow aptitude's advice and end up with a broken (B) package: iBA libgdal20 - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library It would help

Bug#820486: I follow aptitude's advice and end up with a broken (B) package

2016-04-08 Thread 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson
Package: aptitude Version: 0.7.8-1 I follow aptitude's advice and end up with a broken (B) package: iBA libgdal20 - Geospatial Data Abstraction Library And why does it say 0 broken? "Current status: 0 (+0) broken, 8 (+0) upgradable, 51509