Bug#820859: libuv1: Temporarily block testing migration, phase-locking it to nodejs LTS

2016-05-28 Thread Saúl Ibarra Corretgé
Hi there, I'm one of the libuv maintainers. libuv maintains strict backwards API compatibility and ABI stability, so Node LTS will get a libuv upgrade (hopefully) soon see [0]. We follow semver, so a LTS release should be ok using the latest vMAJOR.X, v1.x in this case. There are a couple of an

Bug#820859: libuv1: Temporarily block testing migration, phase-locking it to nodejs LTS

2016-04-13 Thread Luca Bruno
Package: libuv1 Version: 1.9.0-1 Severity: normal We still need to clear up whether nodejs LTS are locked to spcific libuv1 minor versions or not. For the moment, we block 1.9.0 here and wait for clarification before letting it in testing. Discussion is up at https://lists.debian.org/debian-rele

Bug#820859: libuv1: Temporarily block testing migration, phase-locking it to nodejs LTS

2016-04-13 Thread Julian Gilbey
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:25:19AM +0200, Luca Bruno wrote: > Package: libuv1 > Version: 1.9.0-1 > Severity: normal > > We still need to clear up whether nodejs LTS are locked to spcific libuv1 > minor versions or not. > For the moment, we block 1.9.0 here and wait for clarification before lettin

Bug#820859: libuv1: Temporarily block testing migration, phase-locking it to nodejs LTS

2016-04-15 Thread Jérémy Lal
2016-04-13 20:36 GMT+02:00 Julian Gilbey : > On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 10:25:19AM +0200, Luca Bruno wrote: > > Package: libuv1 > > Version: 1.9.0-1 > > Severity: normal > > > > We still need to clear up whether nodejs LTS are locked to spcific libuv1 > > minor versions or not. > > For the moment, we