Control: fixed -1 4.6~rc3-1~exp1
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:46:57PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:10 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:08:54AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:58:31PM -0400, Barry Warsaw
On Tue, 2016-04-19 at 10:10 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:08:54AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:58:31PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > >
> > > On Apr 18, 2016, at 09:40 PM, James McCoy wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I've been
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:58:31PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2016, at 09:40 PM, James McCoy wrote:
>
> >I've been seeing something similar. Am I right to assume that these are
> >union-type=overlay? If so, this seems to be a change in the kernel.
>
> Yep, union-type=overlay.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 10:08:54AM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 09:58:31PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> > On Apr 18, 2016, at 09:40 PM, James McCoy wrote:
> >
> > >I've been seeing something similar. Am I right to assume that these are
> > >union-type=overlay? If so,
On Apr 18, 2016, at 09:40 PM, James McCoy wrote:
>I've been seeing something similar. Am I right to assume that these are
>union-type=overlay? If so, this seems to be a change in the kernel.
Yep, union-type=overlay.
pgpyRCcXhRcjK.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 02:14:58PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> With today's dist-upgrade, I am unable to enter an existing or newly
> created chroot, nor am I able to sbuild or adt-run with the chroot.
>
> I had an existing sid-amd64 chroot which I could not enter. I then
> removed the chroot
Package: schroot
Version: 1.6.10-2
Severity: important
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Dear Maintainer,
With today's dist-upgrade, I am unable to enter an existing or newly
created chroot, nor am I able to sbuild or adt-run with the chroot.
I had an existing sid-amd64 chroot
7 matches
Mail list logo