Bug#823184: umount mounts /proc as a side effect

2016-05-21 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Sat, May 21 2016, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Le 21/05/16 à 21:53, Yuri D'Elia a écrit : >> Sorry for the delay, but I wanted to actually give it a try before >> giving feedback. >> >> Indeed, that obviously fixes the problem. >> >> So is this actually a patch local to debian

Bug#823184: umount mounts /proc as a side effect

2016-05-21 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Le 21/05/16 à 21:53, Yuri D'Elia a écrit : On Fri, May 13 2016, Laurent Bigonville wrote: Can you please try the patch that has been attached to the bug and tell me if it's fixing your issue? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823184#44 Sorry for the delay,

Bug#823184: umount mounts /proc as a side effect

2016-05-21 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Fri, May 13 2016, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Can you please try the patch that has been attached to the bug and tell > me if it's fixing your issue? > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823184#44 Sorry for the delay, but I wanted to actually give it a try

Bug#823184: umount mounts /proc as a side effect

2016-05-13 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Can you please try the patch that has been attached to the bug and tell me if it's fixing your issue? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823184#44 Le 13/05/16 à 17:49, Laurent Bigonville a écrit : Le 13/05/16 à 17:16, Yuri D'Elia a écrit : On Fri, May 13 2016, Laurent

Bug#823184: umount mounts /proc as a side effect

2016-05-13 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Le 13/05/16 à 17:16, Yuri D'Elia a écrit : On Fri, May 13 2016, Laurent Bigonville wrote: Again this is supposed to happen at early boot, and at this stage, only PID1 exists. So I doubt there is a lot of concurrent processes at that time. But this is not checked in the

Bug#823184: umount mounts /proc as a side effect

2016-05-13 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Fri, May 13 2016, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > Again this is supposed to happen at early boot, and at this stage, only > PID1 exists. So I doubt there is a lot of concurrent processes at that time. But this is not checked in the source. In fact, this behavior will happen

Bug#823184: umount mounts /proc as a side effect

2016-05-13 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Le 13/05/16 à 15:12, Yuri D'Elia a écrit : On Fri, May 13 2016, Laurent Bigonville wrote: libselinux mounts /proc, check is the machine supports SELinux and then unmounts it. This is supposed to happen at early boot. I don't understand what selinux is trying to solve here.

Bug#823184: umount mounts /proc as a side effect

2016-05-13 Thread Yuri D'Elia
On Fri, May 13 2016, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > libselinux mounts /proc, check is the machine supports SELinux and then > unmounts it. This is supposed to happen at early boot. I don't understand what selinux is trying to solve here. It's not the job of a library to mount

Bug#823184: umount mounts /proc as a side effect

2016-05-12 Thread Laurent Bigonville
reassign 823184 libselinux1 2.5-1 affects 823184 mount thanks On Sun, 1 May 2016 23:06:54 +0200 Yuri D'Elia wrote: > > Amusing, right? But not too much. > > It does actually happen due to a new behavior in libselinux, which mount links against. > The same is true for any

Bug#823184: umount mounts /proc as a side effect

2016-05-01 Thread Yuri D'Elia
Package: mount Version: 2.28-1 Severity: important Amusing, right? But not too much. It does actually happen due to a new behavior in libselinux, which mount links against. The same is true for any binary in util-linux and coreutils (and so on) See bug #822679 I consider this behavior