Am 21.06.2016 um 23:29 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
> On Tuesday, 21 June 2016 10:39:25 PM AEST Martin Pitt wrote:
>> FTR, we just discussed this on IRC. I'm working on adding the
>> systemd-sysusers binary for now (no sysusers.d/ files and the unit yet, as
>> these need Debianization and an integration
On Tuesday, 21 June 2016 10:39:25 PM AEST Martin Pitt wrote:
> FTR, we just discussed this on IRC. I'm working on adding the
> systemd-sysusers binary for now (no sysusers.d/ files and the unit yet, as
> these need Debianization and an integration test), and we'll upload -3
> RSN.
Excellent. Thank
Dmitry Smirnov [2016-06-16 0:26 +1000]:
> Please, pretty please address the issue ASAP or provide time frame for
> decision to be made... We shouldn't let packages to be broken for so long.
FTR, we just discussed this on IRC. I'm working on adding the
systemd-sysusers binary for now (no sysusers
On Thursday 16 June 2016 00:26:59 Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Dear Michael,
>
> On Monday, 6 June 2016 1:53:02 PM AEST Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Now, regarding my concerns: The size increase is one (which will affect
> > everyone if we ship it s part of the systemd package).
>
> Michael, I don't know
Dear Michael,
On Monday, 6 June 2016 1:53:02 PM AEST Michael Biebl wrote:
> Now, regarding my concerns: The size increase is one (which will affect
> everyone if we ship it s part of the systemd package).
Michael, I don't know how to respond to this. It was mentioned that size
increase we are ta
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Am 06.06.2016 um 09:34 schrieb Luca BRUNO:
> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:58:54 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
> >> Am 05.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
> >>> Could we introduce raw "systemd-sysusers" binary ASAP to fix "rkt" pl
Hi
Am 06.06.2016 um 09:34 schrieb Luca BRUNO:
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:58:54 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Am 05.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
>>> Could we introduce raw "systemd-sysusers" binary ASAP to fix "rkt" please?
>>
>> The size is a concern, and we mentioned this before.
>>
On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 21:58:54 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 05.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
> > Could we introduce raw "systemd-sysusers" binary ASAP to fix "rkt" please?
>
> The size is a concern, and we mentioned this before.
> This really is a wishlist bug, so bumping the severity
On Sunday, 5 June 2016 9:58:54 PM AEST Michael Biebl wrote:
> The size is a concern, and we mentioned this before.
How can little size increase be a serious concern?
> This really is a wishlist bug, so bumping the severity is not justified.
This is not a wishlist bug because a strategically imp
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Am 05.06.2016 um 17:59 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
> Could we introduce raw "systemd-sysusers" binary ASAP to fix "rkt" please?
>
> Other supporting files can be added later at your convenience.
>
> I understand there were no objections so I'm raising severity of this b
Could we introduce raw "systemd-sysusers" binary ASAP to fix "rkt" please?
Other supporting files can be added later at your convenience.
I understand there were no objections so I'm raising severity of this bug in
hope that it could get attention rather sooner than later.
There were already at
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 2:34 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 17.05.2016 um 02:26 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
>> On Sunday, 15 May 2016 2:01:20 PM AEST Michael Biebl wrote:
>>> Can you clarify a bit more, why exactly rkt needs systemd-sysusers?
>>
>> rkt uses systemd-sysusers inside containers therefore
On 16 May 2016 10:09 am, "Jean Baptiste Favre" wrote:
>
> I don't exactly know why they pick up binary from host instead of
> providing it themselves, but, here we are.
Hi,
rkt has a compilation option to choose whether to pick binaries
(systemd, bash) from the host at run-time (aka "flavour hos
On Tuesday, 17 May 2016 2:34:26 AM AEST Michael Biebl wrote:
> I was looking for more details what exactly it is needing
> systemd-sysusers for. Can you explain how the binary is called by rkt
> and when and what kind of users are created (and why)?
Sorry that would be question to upstream as I'm
Am 17.05.2016 um 02:26 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
> On Sunday, 15 May 2016 2:01:20 PM AEST Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Can you clarify a bit more, why exactly rkt needs systemd-sysusers?
>
> rkt uses systemd-sysusers inside containers therefore rkt build-depend on
> systemd-sysusers...
I was looking fo
On Sunday, 15 May 2016 2:01:20 PM AEST Michael Biebl wrote:
> Can you clarify a bit more, why exactly rkt needs systemd-sysusers?
rkt uses systemd-sysusers inside containers therefore rkt build-depend on
systemd-sysusers...
--
Cheers,
Dmitry Smirnov.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digi
On Sun, 15 May 2016 14:01:20 +0200 Michael Biebl wrote:
> Can you clarify a bit more, why exactly rkt needs systemd-sysusers?
rkt (aka stage0) supports several stage1 flavors (the component responsible
for running the containerized-app/stage2). Debian package currently defaults
to the "host" s
Le 15/05/2016 à 14:01, Michael Biebl a écrit :
> Can you clarify a bit more, why exactly rkt needs systemd-sysusers?
Hello,
According to rkt developpers [1]:
rkt takes the systemd-sysusers binary from the host and put it in rkt's
stage1. It does not run it directly on the host. So if the Debian
s
Am 15.05.2016 um 13:50 schrieb Dmitry Smirnov:
> Any news here please?
Fwiw, I share the same concerns as Felipe about increasing the footprint
about ~308 kB for everyone, especially since sysusers isn't used
anywhere else atm.
Splitting it out is something I'm not keen about either.
Can you clar
Any news here please?
--
All the best,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is
granted, all else follows.
-- George Orwell
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On 5 May 2016 at 00:35, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hey Felipe,
>
> Felipe Sateler [2016-05-03 10:06 -0300]:
>> So, if we don't want to get in the business of defining users, just
>> providing the binary would be sufficient for this purpose.
>
> TBH, I see little reason to not just enable it wholesale [1
Hey Felipe,
Felipe Sateler [2016-05-03 10:06 -0300]:
> So, if we don't want to get in the business of defining users, just
> providing the binary would be sufficient for this purpose.
TBH, I see little reason to not just enable it wholesale [1]. There
are no new build or binary dependencies, it d
On 3 May 2016 at 09:51, Dmitry Smirnov wrote:
> Source: systemd
> Version: 229-5
> Severity: normal
> Control: affects -1 rkt
>
> Currently systemd does not provide "systemd-sysusers" because of
> "--disable-sysusers" build option.
>
> Would it be possible to build/provide "systemd-sysusers" plea
Source: systemd
Version: 229-5
Severity: normal
Control: affects -1 rkt
Currently systemd does not provide "systemd-sysusers" because of
"--disable-sysusers" build option.
Would it be possible to build/provide "systemd-sysusers" please?
"rkt" recently gained dependency on this binary (#823314).
24 matches
Mail list logo
