Bug#823470: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool

On 05/05/2016 19:07, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2016-05-05 17:16, Giulio Paci wrote: >>> One thing I'm not quite sure I follow yet is the change in the version >>> numbering scheme, both upstream and in the package. This is how it looks >>> to me: >>> >>> 1. Upstream re-used revision r1668

Bug#823470: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool

On 2016-05-05 17:16, Giulio Paci wrote: >> One thing I'm not quite sure I follow yet is the change in the version >> numbering scheme, both upstream and in the package. This is how it looks >> to me: >> >> 1. Upstream re-used revision r1668 and added a -r3 suffix >> -> "r1668" trades a bit of

Bug#823470: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool

Hi Christian, On 05/05/2016 11:08, Christian Kastner wrote: > On 2016-05-05 03:57, Giulio Paci wrote: > >> I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package >> "sequitur-g2p" > >>git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-g2p.git > >> A package review is very

Bug#823470: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool

Hi Giulio, On 2016-05-05 03:57, Giulio Paci wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package "sequitur-g2p" >git clone git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/sequitur-g2p.git > A package review is very welcome as well. Looks good to me. Nice to see that upstream

Bug#823470: RFS: sequitur-g2p/0.0.r1668.r3-1 -- Grapheme to Phoneme conversion tool

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear all, I am looking for a sponsor for an updated version of my package "sequitur-g2p" * Package name: sequitur-g2p Version : 0.0.r1668.r3-1 Upstream Author : Maximilian Bisani * URL