tags 824426 +pending
Hi folks,
thanks for all the reports, discussion, and testing feedback. I
submitted an upload request to my sponsor. The current state of the
package is also pushed to the git repository.
Regards,
Tino
I just tried Tino's 1.5.1 packages, and they appear to work flawlessly,
solving the problem I reported above
(https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824426#17).
Many thanks,
Justus
--
Intelligent and Interactive Systems https://iis.uibk.ac.at/
Institute of Computer Science,
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:14:39 +0200, Tino Keitel wrote:
> absolutely. Actually, I have 1.6.1 packages ready for upload.
Sorry, 1.5.1 packages of cause [1].
It's not pushed to the git repository[2] yet, just send me a notice if
someone wants to look into it.
Regards,
Tino
[1]
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 09:08:17 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
[...]
> OTOH, Debian itself is still on an old, pre-release version. Tino, do
> you still have plans for getting SyncEvolution updated in Debian?
Hi,
absolutely. Actually, I have 1.6.1 packages ready for upload. I just
wanted to do
On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 10:59 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Some information below which might be useful
>
> On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 09:37:24PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > Source: syncevolution
> > Version: 1.4.99.4-5
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > during the
Hello!
Some information below which might be useful
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 09:37:24PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Source: syncevolution
> Version: 1.4.99.4-5
> Severity: serious
>
> Hi,
>
> during the libical transition [1], your package syncevolution was
> rebuilt and it now FTBFS:
Source: syncevolution
Version: 1.4.99.4-5
Severity: serious
Hi,
during the libical transition [1], your package syncevolution was
rebuilt and it now FTBFS:
libtool: link: g++ -I/usr/include/glib-2.0
-I/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/glib-2.0/include -pthread
-I/usr/include/glib-2.0
7 matches
Mail list logo