Hi Nicolas,
Am 03.07.2017 um 18:56 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Given Nicolas' concerns, I've applied his patch from
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824532#118
>
> This will go into unstable first as a preparation for a stable upload
> for 9.1.
This change went into 9.1.
Going fo
Given Nicolas' concerns, I've applied his patch from
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=824532#118
This will go into unstable first as a preparation for a stable upload
for 9.1.
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away fro
Hi,
no we were not able to test all the different U2F devices before merging
them since we do not own most of them.
However, the way I see it, and feel free to disagree, is that adding an
entry in that udev rule (or an equivalent one) is a required step for any
device to work. The library itself m
X-Debbugs-CC: ales...@yubico.com, k...@yubico.com
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 05:10:52PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Am 02.06.2017 um 16:14 schrieb Andreas Gnau:
> > Hello,
> > that patch seems to be a bit old. The latest GIT-version has quite a few
> > more HW-IDs and I think it would be very benef
Am 02.06.2017 um 16:14 schrieb Andreas Gnau:
> Hello,
> that patch seems to be a bit old. The latest GIT-version has quite a few
> more HW-IDs and I think it would be very beneficial to have the latest
> version in stretch in order to provide out-of-the-box support for as
> many tokens as possible.
Hello,
that patch seems to be a bit old. The latest GIT-version has quite a few
more HW-IDs and I think it would be very beneficial to have the latest
version in stretch in order to provide out-of-the-box support for as
many tokens as possible.
https://github.com/Yubico/libu2f-host/blob/e6ee3
Control: tags -1 +patch -moreinfo
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 03:36:06AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Nicolas, please send me a patch against
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/tree/debian/extra/rules/70-debian-uaccess.rules?h=stretch
>
> including all the entries you wa
Am 02.06.2017 um 13:33 schrieb Nicolas Braud-Santoni:
> On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 03:36:06AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>>
>> Nicolas, please send me a patch against
>
> Patch attached.
Hm, the patch seems missing.
Regards,
Michael
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent
Control: tags -1 +patch -moreinfo
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 03:36:06AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> Nicolas, please send me a patch against
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-systemd/systemd.git/tree/debian/extra/rules/70-debian-uaccess.rules?h=stretch
>
> including all the entries you wa
Am 13.11.2016 um 23:57 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 13.11.2016 um 16:06 schrieb Michael Biebl:
>> Am 13.11.2016 um 07:46 schrieb Simon Josefsson:
>>> Hi. The udev file is needed by all applications using u2f, and not all
>>> uses libu2f-host. For example, chromium needs the udev rule to work. It
>>>
Am 13.11.2016 um 16:06 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 13.11.2016 um 07:46 schrieb Simon Josefsson:
>> Hi. The udev file is needed by all applications using u2f, and not all
>> uses libu2f-host. For example, chromium needs the udev rule to work. It
>> just needs to be present on all systems for u2f to
Am 13.11.2016 um 07:46 schrieb Simon Josefsson:
> Hi. The udev file is needed by all applications using u2f, and not all
> uses libu2f-host. For example, chromium needs the udev rule to work. It
> just needs to be present on all systems for u2f to work. Alternatively,
> every package that wants to
Hi. The udev file is needed by all applications using u2f, and not all uses
libu2f-host. For example, chromium needs the udev rule to work. It just needs
to be present on all systems for u2f to work. Alternatively, every package that
wants to talk to a u2f device needs to ship the file which do
Am 12.11.2016 um 23:07 schrieb Rob N ★:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016, at 07:10 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> Hm, I'm not sure if shipping 70-debian-uaccess.rules in the udev
>> package was a good idea in the first place. Imho this file should be
>> maintained by the libu2f-host package, and apparently it a
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016, at 07:10 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Hm, I'm not sure if shipping 70-debian-uaccess.rules in the udev
> package was a good idea in the first place. Imho this file should be
> maintained by the libu2f-host package, and apparently it already ships
> a rules file for that
I would
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Tue, 17 May 2016 17:43:45 +1000 Robert Norris
wrote:
> Package: udev
> Version: 229-6
> Severity: wishlist
>
> 70-debian-uaccess.rules includes rules for Yubico U2F devices. There are
> other U2F devices coming onto the market, and it would be good to
> include tho
16 matches
Mail list logo
