Bug#825608: Remove libnet-jifty-perl?

2017-09-02 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 02:00:23PM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:43:14 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:40:40PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > I noticed that that this bug has been tagged rm-candidate, and I'd like > > > to support

Bug#825608: Remove libnet-jifty-perl?

2017-08-31 Thread gregor herrmann
On Thu, 31 Aug 2017 12:43:14 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:40:40PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > I noticed that that this bug has been tagged rm-candidate, and I'd like > > to support this. There has been no upstream activity on Jifty since 2011 > > and Best

Bug#825608: Remove libnet-jifty-perl?

2017-08-31 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
I noticed that that this bug has been tagged rm-candidate, and I'd like to support this. There has been no upstream activity on Jifty since 2011 and Best Practical abandoned their plans to port RT to this framework (which was, IIRC, the original reason for its creation). There are no rdepends and

Bug#825608: Remove libnet-jifty-perl?

2017-08-31 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 12:40:40PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > I noticed that that this bug has been tagged rm-candidate, and I'd like > to support this. There has been no upstream activity on Jifty since 2011 > and Best Practical abandoned their plans to port RT to this framework > (which w