On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:23:10PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> fwiw, i suppose one could argue that the images in the user attributes
> (the attached keys) themselves (regardless of embedded color profile)
> are under some form of copyright protection that could make them not
> dfsg-free
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 8:37 AM, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
> wrote:
> > On Wed 2016-06-08 04:57:21 -0400, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> >> Package: debian-keyring
> >> Version: 2016.04.22
Hi Bastien,
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Daniel Kahn Gillmor
wrote:
> On Wed 2016-06-08 04:57:21 -0400, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
>> Package: debian-keyring
>> Version: 2016.04.22
>>
>> Currently the package copyright file states:
>>
>> [...]
>> The keys in the
On Wed 2016-06-08 04:57:21 -0400, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Package: debian-keyring
> Version: 2016.04.22
>
> Currently the package copyright file states:
>
> [...]
> The keys in the keyrings don't fall under any copyright.
> [...]
>
> this is inaccurate as key(s) can have JPEG copyright strings
Package: debian-keyring
Version: 2016.04.22
Currently the package copyright file states:
[...]
The keys in the keyrings don't fall under any copyright.
[...]
this is inaccurate as key(s) can have JPEG copyright strings attached.
Thanks.
5 matches
Mail list logo