Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-10-01 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi, On Fri, 30 Sep 2016, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > The real question is: is this upload ACKed by the LTS team? I don't > > have a hold on LTS workflow, and in my thoughts I believe uploads have > > to be ACKed, pretty much like regular security uploads, and stable > > uploads? > > can we

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-09-30 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Raphael, > The real question is: is this upload ACKed by the LTS team? I don't > have a hold on LTS workflow, and in my thoughts I believe uploads have > to be ACKed, pretty much like regular security uploads, and stable > uploads? > can we please have an ack/nack about this VLC security

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-09-11 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sun, Sep 11, 2016 at 08:27:11PM +0200, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > > I think you also need to do the build with -sa, as you need to upload > > the full sources to security-master. > > I pushed it to the mentors. That wasn't really something for you, but more something for whoever sponsor this.

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-09-11 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
On 10.09.2016 14:57 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: Dear LTS team, Mateusz: Hi Mattia! On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:12:47AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:53:49AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: Hi Adam, (answering in general, not in this particular situation)

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-09-10 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Dear LTS team, Mateusz: On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 09:12:47AM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:53:49AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi Adam, > > (answering in general, not in this particular situation) > > > > > > >I've reviewed the upload, but I'm not sure if

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-06-16 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 06:53:49AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Adam, > (answering in general, not in this particular situation) > > > >I've reviewed the upload, but I'm not sure if you coordinated it > >with the LTS team. I find a contradition: > >

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-06-16 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Adam, (answering in general, not in this particular situation) >I've reviewed the upload, but I'm not sure if you coordinated it >with the LTS team. I find a contradition: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-lts/2016/06/msg00031.html >says vlc is no longer supported in wheezy, yet in >

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-06-16 Thread Adam Borowski
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 08:03:28PM +0200, Mateusz Łukasik wrote: > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vlc" > > * Package name: vlc >Version : 2.0.3-5+deb7u3 > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/v/vlc/vlc_2.0.3-5+deb7u3.dsc > > Changes since the last upload: >

Bug#827397: RFS: vlc/2.0.3-5+deb7u3

2016-06-15 Thread Mateusz Łukasik
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "vlc" * Package name: vlc Version : 2.0.3-5+deb7u3 Upstream Author : 1996-2016 the VideoLAN Team * URL : videolan.org * License : LGPL 2.1 Section