On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 23:09:30 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
>
> I was thinking about this bug again, and I think the bug must be elsewhere.
>
> Andrew: Are you able to consistently reproduce this bug on multiple setups ?
>
>
> The reason I think
Control: tag -1 +moreinfo
I was thinking about this bug again, and I think the bug must be elsewhere.
Andrew: Are you able to consistently reproduce this bug on multiple setups ?
The reason I think this bug may not be valid is for 2 reasons:
1) If the bug was valid, it should have been
Surprisingly, I am not able to reproduce this bug, now, on my virtual setup.
Here, the updation to /dev/mapper/ entries are instant as and when partitions
are deleted, without the patch proposed in this bug report.
So inclusion of this patch will depend on the bug reporter's results. We also
need
On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 17:22 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 17:17 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > Handle (broken?) DM Device partitions
> > Debian Bug: #827412
> > --- a/kpartx/kpartx.rules
> > +++ b/kpartx/kpartx.rules
> > @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> > # Create dm tables for
On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 17:17 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Handle (broken?) DM Device partitions
> Debian Bug: #827412
> --- a/kpartx/kpartx.rules
> +++ b/kpartx/kpartx.rules
> @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
> # Create dm tables for partitions
> ENV{DM_ACTION}=="PATH_FAILED|PATH_REINSTATED",
On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 14:32 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
>
>
> To be honest, I'm a little lost now. This last line looks like where the bug
> is,
> but again, if this is the bug, I can't see a reason why the patch worked on
> it.
>
> Can you run the following command on the device that you
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 12:51 -0600, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jun 16 12:48 dm-uuid-mpath-
> 360002ac0190428be -> ../../dm-0
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Jun 16 12:47 dm-uuid-mpath-
> 360002ac0190528be -> ../../dm-1
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:54:08 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 22:47 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 22:35 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > > Control: tag -1 +pending
> > >Â
> > > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 10:48 -0600, Andrew
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 22:47 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 22:35 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 +pending
> >
> > On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 10:48 -0600, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:15:54 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf
>
Control: tag -1 -pending
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 22:35 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Control: tag -1 +pending
>
> On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 10:48 -0600, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:15:54 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf
> > wrote:
> > > Control: tag -1 +confirmed
>
Control: tag -1 +pending
On Thu, 2016-06-16 at 10:48 -0600, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:15:54 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> > Control: tag -1 +confirmed
> >
> >
> > Can you please try the attached patch ?
> >
> >
> >
>
> That works:
Thank you very
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:15:54 +0530 Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
> Control: tag -1 +confirmed
>
>
> Can you please try the attached patch ?
>
>
>
That works:
# ls -l /dev/mapper
total 0
crw--- 1 root root 10, 236 Jun 16 10:23 control
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 7 Jun 16
Control: tag -1 +confirmed
Can you please try the attached patch ?
On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 15:31 -0600, Andrew Patterson wrote:
> Package: multipath-tools
> Version: 0.6.1
>
> Multipath-tools creates device files in /dev/mapper for both the block
> device and its partitions. The partition
Package: multipath-tools
Version: 0.6.1
Multipath-tools creates device files in /dev/mapper for both the block
device and its partitions. The partition device file use the format
/dev/mapper/-partX, where X is the partition number.
Example:
Configuration details:
Testing on an amd64 system
14 matches
Mail list logo