Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-12-13 Thread Hilmar Preuße
unblock 827061 by 828513 stop On 26.06.2016 12:23, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: >

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-12-13 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 04:57:53PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote: > severity 828513 important > stop > > On 26.06.2016 12:23, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > Hi Kurt > > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-12-12 Thread Hilmar Preuße
severity 828513 important stop On 26.06.2016 12:23, Kurt Roeckx wrote: Hi Kurt > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: >

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-25 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 24.11.2016 18:34, Laurent Bigonville wrote: Hi, >> Still no solution for this. I've asked upstream if a patch for proftp >> stable (1.3.5) could be made available[1] too. Not sure if there will be >> some help. >> According to [2] one could use libssl1.0-dev as BD instead. >> Unfortunately

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-24 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 24.11.2016 um 18:34 schrieb Laurent Bigonville: On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:49:48 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Hilmar_Preu=c3=9fe?= wrote: Hi, Still no solution for this. I've asked upstream if a patch for proftp stable (1.3.5) could be made available[1] too. Not sure if there will be some

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-24 Thread Laurent Bigonville
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 10:49:48 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Hilmar_Preu=c3=9fe?= wrote: > Am 26.06.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: > > Hi submitter, Hi, > > > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
On 02.11.2016 10:49, Hilmar Preuße wrote: Hi Kurt, > According to [2] one could use libssl1.0-dev as BD instead. > Unfortunately this removes libpq-dev, which is needed by our package > too. Not sure if the Postgres people will change here so we can use > the work around for stretch. > OK,

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-11-02 Thread Hilmar Preuße
Am 26.06.2016 um 12:23 schrieb Kurt Roeckx: Hi submitter, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at:

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Preuße
forwarded 828513 http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4240 stop On 26.06.2016 12:23, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using > OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: >

Bug#828513: proftpd-dfsg: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0

2016-06-26 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Source: proftpd-dfsg Version: 1.3.5a-1 Severity: important Control: block 827061 by -1 Hi, OpenSSL 1.1.0 is about to released. During a rebuild of all packages using OpenSSL this package fail to build. A log of that build can be found at: