On Sun, 2 Oct 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > It is resolved in the sense it was agreed to make this RC,
> > but I still expected the release policy to be updated accordingly:
> >
> > https://release.debian.org/stretch/rc_policy.txt
> >
> > before closing this report.
>
> I looked at
On 11/09/16 14:50, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Niels Thykier wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 23:23:14 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila
>> wrote:
>>> Greetings.
>>>
>>> I've finally raised to "serious" all the known bugs regarding
>>> "dpkg-buildpackage -A" that were
On Sun, 11 Sep 2016, Niels Thykier wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Aug 2016 23:23:14 +0200 (CEST) Santiago Vila
> wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > I've finally raised to "serious" all the known bugs regarding
> > "dpkg-buildpackage -A" that were still open.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> AFAICT, this
Greetings.
I've finally raised to "serious" all the known bugs regarding
"dpkg-buildpackage -A" that were still open.
Thanks.
On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 23/07/16 19:20, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > Still ok to consider this as a release goal?
>
> Absolutely.
Great, thanks!
On Wed, 20 Jul 2016, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> The additional bugs I filed are at:
>
>
On 23/07/16 19:20, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Kind Release Managers:
>
> All the bugs reported by Lucas Nussbaum last week which have not been
> resolved yet are now either in "pending upload" state, or there is a
> patch available:
>
>
Kind Release Managers:
All the bugs reported by Lucas Nussbaum last week which have not been
resolved yet are now either in "pending upload" state, or there is a
patch available:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=qa-indep;users=debian...@lists.debian.org
Because it was not
On 21/07/16 at 16:40 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2016-07-21 16:18 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:21:02AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >
> >> Some of the new bugs are like this:
> >>
> >> make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.
> >>
> >> Targets
clone 830997 -1
reassign -1 lintian
retitle -1 lintian: fails to detect missing build-indep target in 9 packages
thanks
On 21/07/16 at 16:18 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:21:02AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> > Some of the new bugs are like this:
> >
> > make: ***
On 2016-07-21 16:18 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:21:02AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
>> Some of the new bugs are like this:
>>
>> make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.
>>
>> Targets build-arch and build-indep are mandatory, and this was already
>>
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:21:02AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Some of the new bugs are like this:
>
> make: *** No rule to make target 'build-indep'. Stop.
>
> Targets build-arch and build-indep are mandatory, and this was already
> decided by dpkg author. This is not new, so I would raise
On 21/07/16 at 02:21 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:47:52PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > On 15/07/16 at 00:23 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> >
> > I did some work to verify Santiago's list of affected packages, and
> > identified more affected packages. The additional
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 09:47:52PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 15/07/16 at 00:23 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
>
> I did some work to verify Santiago's list of affected packages, and
> identified more affected packages. The additional bugs I filed are at:
>
On 15/07/16 at 00:23 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
> > Great. We can handle that for Stretch. You can send a ping to the bug
> > reports
> > saying that these are going to be RC for Stretch and that you will bump them
> > after a week, and
Hi,
2016-07-13 17:21 Santiago Vila:
[...]
Back in November I started to check and report each and every source
package for which "dpkg-buildpackage -A" fails.
[...]
Making this a release goal would mean that each and every package in
stretch (once it's stable) would be suitable to be uploaded
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Great. We can handle that for Stretch. You can send a ping to the bug reports
> saying that these are going to be RC for Stretch and that you will bump them
> after a week, and then do that.
Hi. The pings have been sent. Bugs of type "pending
Control: tags -1 confirmed pending
On 13/07/16 18:58, Santiago Vila wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>
>> Thanks for working on this. I'm all for doing this. But before introducing
>> ~100
>> RC bugs, can you give me the intersection of the remaining affected packages
On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Thanks for working on this. I'm all for doing this. But before introducing
> ~100
> RC bugs, can you give me the intersection of the remaining affected packages
> and
> the key packages?
>
> https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.cgi
>
Hi Santiago,
On 13/07/16 18:21, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Dear Release Managers:
>
> Back in November I started to check and report each and every source
> package for which "dpkg-buildpackage -A" fails.
>
> Approximately 293 bugs so far have
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Dear Release Managers:
Back in November I started to check and report each and every source
package for which "dpkg-buildpackage -A" fails.
Approximately 293 bugs so far have been filed about this issue:
20 matches
Mail list logo