Bug#833156: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#833156: Bug#833156: openssl: Please enable s390x asm optimisations

2016-08-08 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-08-01 21:38:07 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote: > I'm just wondering if we should do this for: > - Stable (Does 1.0.1 also have the assembler?) yes, commited > - Backports commited. > Kurt Sebastian

Bug#833156: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#833156: Bug#833156: openssl: Please enable s390x asm optimisations

2016-08-01 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 1 August 2016 at 20:38, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 09:27:02PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> control: fixed -1 1.1.0~pre5-5 >> control: found -1 1.0.2h-1 >> control: notfound -1 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 >> >> On 2016-08-01 15:32:18 [+0100], Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: >> >

Bug#833156: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#833156: Bug#833156: openssl: Please enable s390x asm optimisations

2016-08-01 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2016-08-01 21:38:07 [+0200], Kurt Roeckx wrote: > I'm just wondering if we should do this for: > - Stable (Does 1.0.1 also have the assembler?) From the jessie_stable branch: |./Configure:my $s390x_asm="s390xcap.o s390xcpuid.o:bn-s390x.o s390x-mont.o s390x-gf2m.o::aes-s390x.o aes-ctr.o aes-xts

Bug#833156: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#833156: Bug#833156: openssl: Please enable s390x asm optimisations

2016-08-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 09:27:02PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > control: fixed -1 1.1.0~pre5-5 > control: found -1 1.0.2h-1 > control: notfound -1 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 > > On 2016-08-01 15:32:18 [+0100], Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > > Version: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 > > since when do file bu