Bug#833384: wordnet: multiple packages for the same database

2016-08-15 Thread Dmitry E. Oboukhov
For example, as per goldendict dictionaries tab: goldendict-wordnet  => Total Words: 148730 dict-wn => Total Words: 147311 I think that some articles could not be exported to dict-wn database, so 147311 < 148730. > OK, understood. >> Maybe it is because of

Bug#833384: wordnet: multiple packages for the same database

2016-08-15 Thread Andreas Tille
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 02:53:16PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > > > For example, as per goldendict dictionaries tab: > > > goldendict-wordnet  => Total Words: 148730 > > > dict-wn => Total Words: 147311 > > > > How did you git these numbers?  All I can say is that they

Bug#833384: wordnet: multiple packages for the same database

2016-08-11 Thread أحمد المحمودي
On August 5, 2016 12:41:06 PM EET, Andreas Tille wrote: >> dico-module-wordnet > >I have no idea about this but the maintainer is in CC. May be the bug >report could be turned into: Please create the dico wordnet database >from same source as wordnet? dico-module-wordnet

Bug#833384: wordnet: multiple packages for the same database

2016-08-05 Thread Andreas Tille
Hi Ritesh, On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:07:12PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > Source: wordnet > Severity: normal > > Is there a good reason for having 3 separate packages for the same > wordnet lexical database? > > Right now, we have: > > wordnet > goldendict-wordnet > dict-wn This is

Bug#833384: wordnet: multiple packages for the same database

2016-08-03 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
Source: wordnet Severity: normal Hi, Is there a good reason for having 3 separate packages for the same wordnet lexical database? Right now, we have: wordnet goldendict-wordnet dict-wn dico-module-wordnet >From a dictionary server point of view, having just one pacakge would have been nicer.