On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 03:53:04PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Btw, how do you re-import repacked tarball with the same version ?
>
> git tag -d upstream/
> gbp import-orig
> git tag -d upstream/
> git pull
>
> No idea whether this is the best solution but it works.
umh, why?
Hi Alex,
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 02:22:22PM +0200, Alex Mestiashvili wrote:
> > with Grahams patch is running. I'll upload later today if everything
>
> Thanks!, I just was working on that too :)
> By reverting the commits the watch file was reverted too, but the new
> one was better I think.
>
On 08/16/2016 01:55 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I reverted my changes inside the master branch and currently the build
> with Grahams patch is running. I'll upload later today if everything
Thanks!, I just was working on that too :)
By reverting the commits the watch file was reverted too
Hi,
I reverted my changes inside the master branch and currently the build
with Grahams patch is running. I'll upload later today if everything
builds fine. Please again ping upstream to upgrade liblemon (and if
you might be at it: Replacing liblocfit would be even better!)
Kind regards
Hi Andreas,
On 08/16/2016 09:19 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Graham,
>
> thanks for your hint. Alexandre, what do you think about it? Feel free
> to move my changes to a separate branch and try Graham's approach if you
> think this is OK.
I think it is better to keep the embedded copy of lib
Hi,
>Liblemon created a longish discussion about copyright of autogenerated
>files in binary packages but finally it hit unstable. The bad news is
>that cufflinks does not build with this library. May be I should not
>have choosen master branch but I commited my changes to Git with a
>rebuilt t
Hi Graham,
thanks for your hint. Alexandre, what do you think about it? Feel free
to move my changes to a separate branch and try Graham's approach if you
think this is OK.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:47:24PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote:
> Hi Andreas
>
> I had a bri
Hi Andreas
I had a brief look at getting cufflinks to work with the new liblemon
but did not make any progress.
For now, I suggest making the following change (similar to Gianfranco's above).
@@ -67,9 +67,9 @@ namespace lemon {
}
ExceptionMember& operator=(const ExceptionMember& copy) {
-
Hi Gianfranco,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 07:18:10AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> actually the issue is lemon library, an embedded code copy.
> I found the original library
> https://lemon.cs.elte.hu/trac/lemon/wiki/Downloads
> seems that the embedded code copy is around version 0.7 while no
Hi,
>The problem is, if the package does not build I can't upload it with the
>version ignorant boost. The only thing I can do is commiting the change
>to Git which I did right now.
thanks!
>Anybody else reading here?
actually the issue is lemon library, an embedded code copy.
I found the orig
Hi Gianfranco,
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 06:37:44AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> source: cufflinks
> version: 2.2.1-2
> severity: serious
>
> Hi Andreas, as said in private emails, the package FTBFS with the new
> toolchain, but what you didn't
> notice, is that the failure is not boost r
source: cufflinks
version: 2.2.1-2
severity: serious
Hi Andreas, as said in private emails, the package FTBFS with the new
toolchain, but what you didn't
notice, is that the failure is not boost related, but gcc-6 (the default since
yesterday) instead.
In file included from ./lemon/bits/base_ex
12 matches
Mail list logo