Bug#834958: canl-java: FTBFS too much often (failing tests)

2016-08-22 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:33:53AM +0200, Mattias Ellert wrote: > My Debian installation is a virtual machine using one CPU, so this is > the setup I always use for local builds. The build has never failed for > me on it. Running multiple threads on the one CPU is still faster than > running a

Bug#834958: canl-java: FTBFS too much often (failing tests)

2016-08-22 Thread Mattias Ellert
mån 2016-08-22 klockan 10:21 +0200 skrev Santiago Vila: > On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Mattias Ellert wrote: > > > > > I can not reproduce the problem locally on my machine. > > Please try building on a virtual machine having only 1 CPU. > > Apparently the test suite assumes that parallel should be

Bug#834958: canl-java: FTBFS too much often (failing tests)

2016-08-22 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Mattias Ellert wrote: > I can not reproduce the problem locally on my machine. Please try building on a virtual machine having only 1 CPU. Apparently the test suite assumes that parallel should be faster than linear, but this does not have to be the case at all when you

Bug#834958: canl-java: FTBFS too much often (failing tests)

2016-08-22 Thread Mattias Ellert
In the two logs attached the failing tests say Linear duration: 7089ms, 282.1272393849626ops Parallel duration: 5528ms, 361.794500723589ops and Linear duration: 6150ms, 325.2032520325203ops Parallel duration: 4639ms, 431.1273981461522ops respectively. I.e. the ratios are 7089/5528 = 1.282

Bug#834958: canl-java: FTBFS too much often (failing tests)

2016-08-20 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: src:canl-java Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer: I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A" (which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it) but it failed: