On 09/10/2016 09:00 PM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Some people here have the theory (which I don't share) that it's ok
> that a package FTBFS sometimes as far as it builds "most of the time",
> i.e. the RC-ness is apparently based on a statistical measure.
Build predictability (and in fact,
[ I am more calmed now, thanks. I am going to disagree with you as
friendly as I can in this message ].
BTW: If you missed this message, you should probably read it first:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=834964#20
On Sat, Sep 10, 2016 at 06:42:23PM +0200, Thomas Goirand
Santiago,
I would strongly suggest that you take a step back, and calm down.
There's no reason to adopt the kind of tone you've used. I'll attempt to
make a reasonable answer anyway.
On 09/09/2016 11:55 AM, Santiago Vila wrote:
> The bug said stretch, and you tried sid, so you didn't really try
On Fri, 9 Sep 2016, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> With an up-to-date Sid, I couldn't reproduce this issue. Therefore, I'm
> closing this bug. Feel free to continue discussing it even when it has
> the closed status if you want to continue investigating.
The bug said stretch, and you tried sid, so you
Package: src:testresources
Version: 1.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Dear maintainer:
I tried to build this package in stretch with "dpkg-buildpackage -A"
(which is what the "Arch: all" autobuilder would do to build it)
but it failed:
5 matches
Mail list logo
