Package: sponsorship-requests
Followup-For: Bug #835368
Control: tags -1 wontfix
As the license is non-free, tagging the RFS as wontfix: It cannot be uploaded
to main.
I did not check if if non-free would be possible as target.
--
tobi
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT
Am Donnerstag, den 25.08.2016, 20:56 +0200 schrieb Elmar Stellnberger:
(snip)
>
> Anyone else who could assert me that an additional GPL-3 clause
> would
> do what I want: i.e. give an additional right to relicense to a
> group
> called original authors only; let this be called GPL-3 + relic
Hi Gianfranco, Hi Tobias,
Hi all Readers of this Debian Mentor Request,
Am 2016-08-25 um 13:12 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
Now this is an additional restriction: you need to provide everything
that is necessary to run your software under an OSS based system (with
exceptions given for the ke
(dropping people who reads mentors)
> Yes, that is a good point and it certainly proves that GPL would work
>in this regard; but what about the other two issues:
I guess so
> Now this is an additional restriction: you need to provide everything
>that is necessary to run your software und
Am 2016-08-25 um 12:39 schrieb Andrew Shadura:
On 25 August 2016 at 11:53, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
Am 2016-08-25 um 10:45 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
I see many GPL-2 similar-looking licenses, with some special exceptions,
e.g.
"In addition to the above license, you can relicense this so
On 25 August 2016 at 11:53, Elmar Stellnberger wrote:
> Am 2016-08-25 um 10:45 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
>>
>> I see many GPL-2 similar-looking licenses, with some special exceptions,
>> e.g.
>> "In addition to the above license, you can relicense this software in
>> whatever
>> form you want
Am 2016-08-25 um 10:45 schrieb Gianfranco Costamagna:
I see many GPL-2 similar-looking licenses, with some special exceptions, e.g.
"In addition to the above license, you can relicense this software in whatever
form you want, with a special exception: you can't do foo and bar if you change
the
l
Hi,
> Yes, I know that usage of an own license is discouraged due to the
>many issues that may arise. However I do certainly have a point in
>creating this license as I wanna keep the right to re-license which is
>not included by GPL.
I don't want to start a new thread, because I really t
Am 2016-08-25 um 06:52 schrieb Tobias Frost:
Am Mittwoch, den 24.08.2016, 22:06 +0200 schrieb Elmar Stellnberger:
The license in use, C-FSL v1.0 will still need to be reviewed. A
predecessor license C-FSL v0.8 had already been discussed on
debian-legal some time ago. However v1.0 has been
Am Mittwoch, den 24.08.2016, 22:06 +0200 schrieb Elmar Stellnberger:
>
>
> The license in use, C-FSL v1.0 will still need to be reviewed. A
> predecessor license C-FSL v0.8 had already been discussed on
> debian-legal some time ago. However v1.0 has been reworked basing
> on the input I had
Package: sponsorship-requests
Subject: RFS: confinedrv/1.7.7-3 [ITP] -- Hi everyone!
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "confinedrv":
* Package name: confinedrv
Version : 1.7.7-3
Upstream Author : Elmar Stellnberger
* URL
11 matches
Mail list logo
