Bug#837629: u-boot 2016.09 in Debian

2016-09-16 Thread Rick Thomas
On Sep 15, 2016, at 10:43 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Control: severity 837629 serious > > On 2016-09-14, Rick Thomas wrote: >> On Sep 14, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> >>> Worst case, we have to remove it from stretch again if it

Bug#837629: u-boot 2016.09 in Debian

2016-09-15 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Control: severity 837629 serious On 2016-09-14, Rick Thomas wrote: > On Sep 14, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > >> Worst case, we have to remove it from stretch again if it really is that >> bad... > > I’ll certainly do the test. If it still doesn’t work on the

Bug#837629: u-boot 2016.09 in Debian

2016-09-14 Thread Rick Thomas
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 2:37 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > On 2016-09-10, Karsten Merker wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:22:23AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >>> The current u-boot packages in Debian experimental (2016.09~rc2+dfsg1-1) >>> appear to be working fine

Bug#837629: u-boot 2016.09 in Debian

2016-09-14 Thread Rick Thomas
On Sep 14, 2016, at 5:31 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Worst case, we have to remove it from stretch again if it really is that > bad... I’ll certainly do the test. If it still doesn’t work on the OpenRD, I would not remove it from stretch just yet. Frankly, there just

Bug#837629: u-boot 2016.09 in Debian

2016-09-14 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2016-09-14, Rick Thomas wrote: >> On Sep 12, 2016, at 2:37 PM, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> >> On 2016-09-10, Karsten Merker wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 05, 2016 at 09:22:23AM -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: The current u-boot packages in Debian experimental