control: tag -1 +pending
Hello Didier,
On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:22:28AM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> I now gathered some old memories and remembered that there was indeed a bug
> about this that got stalled: #707851 (which was the TC bug). See from message
> #475 (September 2015), whe
Sean Whitton writes:
> diff --git a/policy.xml b/policy.xml
> index 3daa532..934a85b 100644
> --- a/policy.xml
> +++ b/policy.xml
> @@ -8990,14 +8990,8 @@ Reloading description
> configuration...done.
> receive extra contributions such as translations.
>
>
> -Pac
Le jeudi, 3 août 2017, 08.53:09 h CEST Didier 'OdyX' Raboud a écrit :
> Le mardi, 1 août 2017, 11.01:10 h CEST Sean Whitton a écrit :
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:55:31PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > > We also approved the decision that packages should not include both a
> > > menu file and a de
Sean Whitton writes:
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 05:51:27PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
>> P.S. Just in case this is an oversight, rather than an intentional
>> change:
>>
>> Shouldn't "desktop entry" and "Debian menu entry" be somehow
>> emphasised, to make it clear that there is a reference b
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 05:51:27PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> P.S. Just in case this is an oversight, rather than an intentional
> change:
>
> Shouldn't "desktop entry" and "Debian menu entry" be somehow
> emphasised, to make it clear that there is a reference back to the
> earlier definit
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 05:51:27PM +0200, Philip Hands wrote:
> You appear to have a singular/plural mismatch with:
>
> installs a FreeDesktop desktop entries
>
> I guess that should instead be:
>
> installs FreeDesktop desktop entries
>
> (or perhaps it should be singular throughout, I'm n
Hi Sean,
Sean Whitton writes:
> control: tag -1 +patch
>
> Hello tech-ctte,
>
> On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:09AM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
>> So yes, point 2 corresponds to your:
>> > - delete that paragraph
>> > - add a new paragraph saying "if there is a desktop file, there should
>
control: tag -1 +patch
Hello tech-ctte,
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 08:53:09AM +0200, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote:
> So yes, point 2 corresponds to your:
> > - delete that paragraph
> > - add a new paragraph saying "if there is a desktop file, there should
> > be no menu file"
> [...]
> That said, n
Control: reassign -1 debian-policy 4.0.0.4
Control: affects -1 + tech-ctte
Hi Sean,
Le mardi, 1 août 2017, 11.01:10 h CEST Sean Whitton a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:55:31PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > We also approved the decision that packages should not include both a
> > menu file
Hello Sam,
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 02:55:31PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> We also approved the decision that packages should not include both a
> menu file and a desktop file.
For reference, Policy currently says that packages should include a
desktop file, and may also include a menu file for th
package: tech-ctte
In #741573, the TC produced a two-part decision.
We approved specific wording regarding .desktop policy. That was folded
into a policy NMU.
We also approved the decision that packages should not include both a
menu file and a desktop file.
The action to draft language for that
11 matches
Mail list logo
