Bug#839250: - gunicorn backport >= 19.6.0-6

2016-10-07 Thread Neil Williams
On Fri, 07 Oct 2016 11:19:02 +0100 Chris Lamb wrote: (sorry, missed the CC: list in error) > > > Right, but that's for stretch where the sysadmin will be clearly > > > be more aware of and/or even looking for issues. I don't want to > > > break existing systems right now. >

Bug#839250: - gunicorn backport >= 19.6.0-6

2016-10-07 Thread Chris Lamb
> > Right, but that's for stretch where the sysadmin will be clearly be > > more aware of and/or even looking for issues. I don't want to break > > existing systems right now. > So how are packages using gunicorn to handle support for both stretch > and jessie-backports? Packages in jessie can't

Bug#839250: - gunicorn backport >= 19.6.0-6

2016-10-07 Thread Neil Williams
On Thu, 06 Oct 2016 19:32:31 +0100 Chris Lamb wrote: > Neil Williams wrote: > > > Once 19.6.0-6 gets into stretch, could we have an updated backport > > please? > > > > … I previously hesitated to do that as it would be a real world > > > regression for people using Debian