Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2017-02-02 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778094 On 12/12/16 22:37, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:32:30PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> I need the full log. Run valgrind like this: >> >> valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full --leak-resol

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-12-12 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:32:30PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I need the full log. Run valgrind like this: > > valgrind --tool=memcheck --leak-check=full --leak-resolution=high > --num-callers=20 --log-file=vgdump.txt .libs/check_data_proxy > > And attach vgdump.txt Ok, here it is.

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-12-12 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 12/12/16 22:19, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:54:57PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Huh, this is crashing in libc's malloc(). >> >> Can you run the test under valgrind's memcheck? Maybe there's some memory >> corruption that would explain this. > > Do you mean t

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-12-12 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 09:54:57PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Huh, this is crashing in libc's malloc(). > > Can you run the test under valgrind's memcheck? Maybe there's some memory > corruption that would explain this. Do you mean this? valgrind the-test-that-we-want-to-debug How

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-12-12 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 12/12/16 21:38, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:12:00PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Unfortunately you're missing libc6-dbg and libsqlite3-0-dbg. Could you get a >> backtrace with those, so that I can forward this upstream? > > Sure. Here it is: > > $ gdb tests/

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-12-12 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 08:12:00PM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Unfortunately you're missing libc6-dbg and libsqlite3-0-dbg. Could you get a > backtrace with those, so that I can forward this upstream? Sure. Here it is: $ gdb tests/data-models/.libs/check_data_proxy tests/data-models/c

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-12-12 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi Santiago, On 21/10/16 17:32, Santiago Vila wrote: > retitle 839444 libgda5: FTBFS sometimes (check_data_proxy fails) > thanks > > Hello Lucas. > > You are reporting two different things here, this usually makes things > more difficult to maintainers. It is usually a lot better to report > dif

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-10-21 Thread Santiago Vila
retitle 839444 libgda5: FTBFS sometimes (check_data_proxy fails) thanks Hello Lucas. You are reporting two different things here, this usually makes things more difficult to maintainers. It is usually a lot better to report different things in different reports. This is what you reported first:

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-10-09 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/10/16 at 13:40 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Hi Lucas! > > Am 04.10.2016 um 12:56 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > > On 04/10/16 at 12:13 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 08:34:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > >>> severity 839444 serious > >>> thanks > >> [...] > >>>

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-10-04 Thread Michael Biebl
Hi Lucas! Am 04.10.2016 um 12:56 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum: > On 04/10/16 at 12:13 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 08:34:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >>> severity 839444 serious >>> thanks >> [...] If you can reproduce the problem, please provide a backtrace from

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-10-04 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 04/10/16 at 12:13 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 08:34:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > severity 839444 serious > > thanks > [...] > > > If you can reproduce the problem, please provide a backtrace from the > > > segmentation fault. > > > > I can (on two differe

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-10-04 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 08:34:16AM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > severity 839444 serious > thanks [...] > > If you can reproduce the problem, please provide a backtrace from the > > segmentation fault. > > I can (on two different machines) ... but you still don't want to provide a backtrace? Ok

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-10-03 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
severity 839444 serious thanks On 04/10/16 at 07:48 +0200, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > Control: tags -1 + unreproducible moreinfo > > Hello Lucas Nussbaum > > Thanks for your bug report. > > On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 04:12:57PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > Sou

Bug#839444: libgda5: FTBFS: tests failures annotations:

2016-10-03 Thread Andreas Henriksson
Control: severity -1 important Control: tags -1 + unreproducible moreinfo Hello Lucas Nussbaum Thanks for your bug report. On Sat, Oct 01, 2016 at 04:12:57PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Source: libgda5 > Version: 5.2.4-2 > Severity: serious > Tags: stretch sid > User: debian...@lists.debian.o