Hi Thorsten,
> On 8 Oct 2016, at 21:52, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> James Clarke dixit:
>
>> I agree, this is bad. However, if this is only affecting sarge chroots,
>
> I never said that. That’s just where I noticed it.
Ok, my bad, that's just how I read it.
> Every time anything listed in REM
James Clarke dixit:
>I agree, this is bad. However, if this is only affecting sarge chroots,
I never said that. That’s just where I noticed it.
Every time anything listed in REMOVEPACKAGES has a different state
between the host system and the chroot, and when the chroot’s distro
doesn’t actually
Control: found -1 0.224
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Thorsten,
> On 8 Oct 2016, at 21:20, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>
> Package: pbuilder
> Version: 0.226.1
> Severity: serious
> Justification: breaks basic use
>
> The remove_packages function in pbuilder-modules contains:
>
>if (dpk
Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.226.1
Severity: serious
Justification: breaks basic use
The remove_packages function in pbuilder-modules contains:
if (dpkg -s "$pkg" 2>&1)>/dev/null ; then
This obviously must be:
if ($CHROOTEXEC dpkg -s "$pkg" 2>&1)>/dev/null ; then
Because of thi
4 matches
Mail list logo
